Popular Posts

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

Building a fair Hiring process: Overcoming political challenges

 BLESSIE JANE PAZ B. ANTONIO

JANICE D. RASAY

Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines

Abstract

The hiring process and promotions involving politics is a critical component of governance that has an effect on public trust and the integrity of the organization. This paper explores the ethical issues in the political hiring process and promotions of individuals. It discusses hiring processes like nepotism and political patronage systems and the effects of these on both individuals and the organization. It also discusses the importance of transparency and accountability measures in the hiring process and promotion. The paper concludes that it is important to prioritize transparency and accountability so that the vacant positions are filled with qualified individuals who will have a better contribution to the efficiency of the organization.

Keywords: Nepotism, favouritism, political hiring, Political patronage, ethical, transparency, accountability

Introduction

Every organization is striving to have effective recruitment and selection practices to retain well-qualified, experienced, and skilled employees for a specific position, but then again in a competitive job market, applicants are struggling to find a suitable job for their career. (Santos et. al., 2020). Human Resources is responsible for maintaining a productive and harmonious work environment and supporting the organization’s overall goals by effectively managing its human capital. Thus, hiring the wrong candidate or failing to hire suitable candidates would result in low performance and workplace failure. (Santos et. al., 2020). While merit and qualifications are important, there are factors like personal connections and political alliances that affect the hiring and selection process of human resources. To protect public sector jobs from becoming instruments of political patronage, employment decisions must be governed by impartial, meritocratic hiring practices. But in many civil service systems, politicians retain broad discretion in personnel decisions. (Prem et.al., 2019). Discretion, this argument goes, allows politicians to hire and promote candidates whose competence and motivation are not easily measured in formal examinations. (Prem et.al., 2019). This political hiring process often reflects societal issues like biases, poor governance, corruption and diminishing public trust. The integrity and fairness of the hiring process are also affected. The key factors of employee performance are integrity, reliability, and honesty in discharging their job responsibilities. Therefore, it is vital to conduct a staffing process without any pressure or political influence (Santos et. al.,2020).

Nepotism in Political Hiring or Political Connections

Nepotism can be defined as favouritism towards relatives, usually in the form of offering them jobs. (Ragauskas et.al, 2020). In the public sector, it is considered a particularly toxic phenomenon as it goes against the public interest: citizens generally expect that public employees should deserve their jobs, hired according to merit-based criteria (Fisman and Golden 2017). Often, candidates with strong political ties or networks may receive preferential treatment during the hiring, process. These are situations where less qualified individuals are hired over more competent candidates simply due to their connections. For example, in a certain department in a government unit, they hire an applicant based on the discretion of the political individuals regardless of their qualifications. This can both affect the applicants and the organization. Applicants hired based on discretion may feel less valued and less committed to their roles. They may feel like they were not chosen for their skills and abilities, but rather for other reasons, which can lead to lower job satisfaction and a higher turnover rate. Also, when they are hired based on political connections, they may not have the same level of training and development opportunities as those who are seen as more "deserving." This can limit their career growth potential. For the organization, it could lower productivity. This can lead to a workforce that is not as skilled or competent as it could be., So, this will result to reduced efficiency and a decline in the overall performance of the organization.

Political Patronage Systems

Political patronage is the appointment or hiring of a person to a government post on the basis of partisan loyalty. Elected officials at the national, state, and local levels of government use such appointments to reward the people who help them win and maintain office. This practice led to the saying, “To the victor belong the spoils.” (Baracskay, 2009). The term was by New York Senator William L. Marcy, referring to the victory of Andrew Jackson in the election of 1828, with the term spoils meaning goods or benefits taken from the loser in a competition, election or military victory. The saying simply explains “The winner gets the rewards”. An example of this is when an individual shows loyalty during the campaign work, financial contributions, or other forms of assistance during elections to a political individual in return for favours like giving them a job or promoting them to a higher position. Basically, they are hired based on their loyalty not on merit and qualifications. This practice can result in inefficiency and corruption within governmental agencies as loyalty replaces competence.

The Importance of Transparency

Transparency lays the foundation for building trust between candidates and organizations. By openly sharing information about the company culture, values and expectations, companies create an environment of honesty and authenticity. This, in turn, instils confidence in candidates, fostering stronger employer-candidate relationships. (Sequeira, 2024). We often consider the behaviour of the job applicants and their honesty in presenting their credentials when conducting recruitment and selection processes. But transparency also applies to the organization or the employer. Employers have the responsibility to run a transparent hiring process for their potential applicants. A transparent recruiting process is characterized by clarity, integrity, and fairness from the hiring organization. Every applicant should be treated equally and fairly. A transparent hiring process also makes the applicant feel respected which in return it develops a positive employee relationship. This positivity will be carried into their work life. his increases the chances that they will become loyal workers significantly reducing employee turnover rates.

Conclusion

The hiring process and promotion of individuals need careful consideration to prevent ethical issues like nepotism, corruption, political connections and even poor governance. These issues can affect the public trust as well as the integrity of the organization. To prevent these issues, it is important to prioritize transparency and accountability in the hiring process and promotion. An organization known for being transparent will make a good reputation to the public. We can also ensure that the qualified individuals who are committed to serving the public should be hired based on merit, not on political influences. Thus, everything that an organization do affects its reputation. If you are viewed as a reliable and transparent employer/organization even in standard yet critical processes like recruitment and hiring process, it shows your capacity for reliability in the way you treat your employees, do business, and handle challenges.

References

Santos, A., Armano, A., Setiawan, M., Rofiq, A. (2020) Effect of recruitment, selection and culture of organizations on state personnel performance. Management Science Letters. DOI:10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.042

Prem, M.,Teso, E., Collonnellie, E.,(2019). The role of political connections in public employment dynamics.

Ragauskas R., Valeskaite, I.(2020). Nepotism, political competition and overemployment. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2020.1781542

Baracskay, D.(2009).Political Patronage. Free Speech Center. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/political-patronage/

Sequeira, C.(2024). why is transparency crucial in the recruitment process?.hi!re. https://www.hiire.me/post/the-power-of-transparency-in-the-recruitment-process

 

 

 

 

Building a fair Hiring process: Overcoming political challenges

  BLESSIE JANE PAZ B. ANTONIO JANICE D. RASAY Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines Abstract The hiring process and pr...