Popular Posts

Friday, June 24, 2022

Philosophical Reflection: The Way of Life

 Wilhelm Peralta (2022)

(The paper reflects the idea of the author, not the editor)

“Vain is the word of that philosopher which does not heal any suffering of man." Epicurus

Abstract

Throughout history, various ideologies have been passed down through the generations. Some of these include absolute absurdism, existentialism, and various other forms of philosophy. Various points go into analyzing these ideas, such as how we got here, who we are, and what happens to us when we die.

The dominant image of philosophy focuses on formality, fundamentality, widespread use of intuitions, and showing the history of the discipline. Indeed, the practise of philosophy is conditioned by forces outside the control of some philosophers.

Any philosophy is a matter of achieving and striving how to apply the medium of critical thinking and reflection of interpretation and weighing evidence, debate, counter-arguments and also assessing critically and impartially the fruitfulness of various approaches to a special set of circumstances out of the universal of mankind. It seeks the integration of knowledge of the sciences and with other fields to accomplish and consistent and coherent worldview. A fragment of human knowledge, skills and experience, and reflection upon life as a totality.

Keywords: Philosophy Reflection, Way of Life, 21st-century Philosophy, Philosophy as  Therapy.

Introduction

In the 21st century, Philosophy is observed through theoretical, idealism, progressivism, constructivism, perennialism, and detached from life. It was a way of life not just being thought in academe but it was considered as a medium of living, practice from resilience and the self according to an ideal of wisdom into transforming oneself. A conversion and reflection into the process of living into exploring own of wisdom. Indeed, the exercises of spiritual beliefs into self-transformation and their reflection into its philosophy a way of life.

Great Philosophers thought the generation of having concerns that go beyond the everyday demands of life. They embrace the distance between their actions and the sequence of ordinary life that hold it into fashion, tradition, and conformity. The regular appeal, as a kind of disciplinary statement such as commitment to the truth even one's claim to live from the bases of Socratic belief. Others appreciate the working life as structured by forces not directly responsive to reasoned argument and that these forces shape the work they do. The practice of philosophy is conditioned by forces outside the control of individual philosophers, (Doyle, 2014).

            The breakthrough of philosophy has achieved a complete disciplinary recognition and with a pure inquiry into cares simply for truth. It is a discipline in the sense of occupying a definable position in humanity and accounting for certain of its features.

Dotson (2012) emphasizes primarily addressing the coercive nature of the implicit norms of the discipline that tend to silence what is potentially distinctive in the voices of female and minority philosophers. But the mechanism she identifies is general: work that in any way veers away from fundamental questions posed as universal and mostly formal can be met with the demand for proof of identity: how is this philosophy? That this question is so often asked in this rhetorical way suggests both that a) there is no explicit theoretical agreement about what philosophy is and b) the background assumption that philosophy is identical to the professional image is fairly widespread.

Campbell (2006) is one, a laudatory official history of the American Philosophical Association (APA). It is a valuable work of history, but it refrains from theorizing about causal relationships between a professional organization and philosophical content and instead tries to identify particular philosophical contributions that, for example, APA addresses have made to the discipline. It is, that is, still a history of ideas separated from material conditions. The very nature of philosophy is itself a contested philosophical issue, and views about this issue are philosophically controversial. Although the investigation of the proper aims and methods of philosophy is nowadays known as metaphilosophy, it is not a distinct higher-order discipline but an integral part of philosophy itself (Glock, 2008).

Philosophy as Stoic and Epicurean Therapy

The conceptualization of Philosophy is to treat and relieve suffering and is viewed as analogous to medicine, and the philosopher was seen as the physician of the soul who cured the irritation, irrational fears, empty desires, and false beliefs. It emphasized the passions of emotion as a source of emptinesses and sickness, without these, humanity is suffering from worries, fears, anger, unworthy, unrecognized, disorder, and unrest in our soul. Philosophy thus appears as a therapeutic of the passions. Its therapeutic method is linked to a profound transformation of the individual’s mode of seeing and being (Sherefkin, 2017).

The Stoic sage is apatheia, from the Greek meaning without feeling that the good life is life without passion. Giving the importance to external and attached to what is not under the control and set for upset and grief. The moral guide for living a good life and focusing on the components of life which we can control (Swift, 2021). Even though the Stoic belief in complete self-sufficiency is false, there is something to be said for a person who is not enslaved to the glitter of the world.  Put in a positive light the Stoic can be described as a self-commanding person-one who, rather than being the slave of fortune, is truly free just because she doesn’t care for the things that fortune controls.  Commanding herself, she commands all that is important for living well in a world in which most people value things-such as money that appears to offer power but offers slavery the wise person is the only truly, free person. (Sherefkin, 2017).

            Epicureanism seeks peace of mind and removes the unhappiness and unrest, they call such desires hollow because they know no limit and can never be satisfied.  No amount of money will ever be enough for those who pursue a life of wealth. These desires are not natural but a consequence of false beliefs and a corrupt society.  Natural desires, on the other hand, have limits and are easily satisfied.  Simple food can satisfy our hunger as well as the most expensive delicacies. 

The greatest source of misery and unhappiness, more than living an empty life, is our fear of death. The fear of death can be so intense that it can drive a person to suicide.  As Lucretius, a Roman disciple of Epicurus wrote “fear of death, Induces hate of life and light, and men are so depressed that they destroy themselves. Having forgotten that this fear.” Epicurus calls such desires “hollow” because they know no limit and can never be satisfied.  No amount of money will ever be enough for those who pursue a life of wealth. These desires are not natural but a consequence of false beliefs and a corrupt society.  Natural desires, on the other hand, have limits and are easily satisfied.  Simple food can satisfy our hunger as well as the most expensive delicacies. (Sherefkin, 2017).

Hobbes Approach to Balancing Liberty of Contract

The Philosopher Thomas Hobbes with his approach to pushing authority contract and power of the state, in which his treatment, properly appreciates authority’s source in individual liberty. The social contract binds man to civil society in establishing a legitimate government and subsuming all agreements. Wherein Hobbes makes it clear that the state will intervene in terms of the good of the people. While the sovereign power should exercise its influence (Pope, 2011).

In America, the philosophy of liberal democratic constitutionalism brought many heretofore overlooked as causes of faction are true as sown like the man as affliction will not be lightly overcome. The traces of its sources is through the diversity of passions and a difference in knowledge among men.

The American Constitution in light of Hobbesian principles touches the major parallels between our founding document and Hobbesian philosophy as itself a social contract, whereby the people of the several states divest themselves of certain powers and privileges for the sake of commodious living. Taken together, the Preamble’s tenets, forming the philosophic core of the new regime, coincide precisely with the contractual motivations espoused by Thomas Hobbes (Nichols, 2011).

Attention to the Present, Death, and Views Above

            Freedom from choosing beliefs is to ensure spiritual progress toward the ideal state of wisdom through self-control and meditation. According to Philosopher Pierre Hadot, “man lives in the world without perceiving the world.” This kind of belief is that we can only be in the present if free from the past and the future. Enjoy the present moment, live freely not thinking between the past and future, memory and expectation, regret and worry, and the process loses the present moment.

According to Pope (2011), the Stoics and the Epicureans explained the importance of being in the present moment. But what this meant in practice for them was very different. For the Stoic being in the present moment demanded constant tension and effort. For the Epicurean being in the present meant learning how to relax and have peace of mind. The difference Epicurean enjoys the present moment while the Stoic wills it intensely; for the one, it is a pleasure; for the other, a duty.   Though they seem like opposites, Stoicism and Epicureanism, like inhalation and exhalation, complement each other the Roman emperor and Stoic, Marcus Aurelius, believed we would be radically changed if we lived as if each day were our last. The thought of imminent death transforms our way of acting radically, by forcing us to become aware of the infinite value of each instant. We must accomplish each of life’s actions as if it were the last.

From the perspective of the universal, our cares and concerns seem trivial and insignificant. The view from above changes our value judgments on things: luxury, power, war…and the worries of everyday life become ridiculous.

Conclusion:

            The integrated view of the world is through our philosophy as a basis of system beliefs into reality. A foundation of knowledge, humankind, the role in the world, understanding of the existence and provides premises through the discovery of truth and by views in supporting life. From this point of view, this will test our character and critically determined the reality of the truth for the sake of attaining wisdom.

Philosophers are critical and reflective to give a view of the whole life, the life, and the world view, the discovery of knowledge, and other disciplines to achieve a wish to see life. It also attempts to bring the functions of human inquiry, religion, history, and science with the meaningful interpretation that may provide information, skills and knowledge, and views for our lives.

Philosophy makes people drive for decision-making because the fundamental questions of philosophy are important. Without a philosophy of man, reality, truth, value or group cannot poster good decisions for the lives of individuals or humankind. That no decision-making is unrelated to the issues of reality, truth, and value. A better function with proper understanding than to wonder what is all about life in ignorance of factors that shape our choices and beliefs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References 

Dash, Shri Nikunja (2015). PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION. Jigun Graphics

Badambadi, Cuttack-1. UTKAL UNIVERSITY: VANIVIHAR, BHUBANESWAR

Glock, Hans (2018). What is Analytic Philosophy?. https://philpapers.org/rec/GLOWIA-4 Retrieved May 17, 2022

Lloyd, Sharon A. (2018) Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-moral/ Retrieved May 15, 2022.

Nichols, Shaun (2011). An experimental philosophy manifesto. https://philpapers.org/rec/KNOAEP. Retrieved May 15, 2022.

Sherefkin, Jack (2017). Philosophy of Life. https: //www.nypl.org/blog/ 2017/09/13/ philosophy-way-life. Retrieved May 15, 2022.

Strickland, Donna. 2011. The Managerial Unconscious in the History of Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press 

Swift, Michael (2021). Integrative Psychotherapist | BSc(Hon), MSc, MBACP. https://www.counselling-directory.org.uk/memberarticles/how-stoicism-changed-my-life-and-can-change-yours-too. Retrieved May 14, 2022.

 

 

 

 

 

Myself, My Work, My God, and My Environment: Personal Reflection of My Existence

RACQUEL ISIDORA D. GUZMAN


This is my first attempt to deconstruct my inner self. I will decode the phenomenon as “Myself, My Work, My God, and My Environment.”

I am aware of the many factors which influence a person’s personality. The age-long debate on nature versus nurture is one way of determining or understanding the nature of a person. While it is true that my family background has something to do with the way I behave and socialize with anyone else, peer influence has also given me a great deal.

In terms of goals and priorities, I am greatly impressed and motivated by the success stories of individuals who particularly excel in their chosen fields and at the same time, they were able to manage a family who has a God-fearing, responsible, and well-disciplined children. With my vision of a secured family (in all aspects of life), I am motivated always to give my loved ones moral and financial support and protection, and by being a responsible wife, mother, and a public servant/worker.

I know myself well and I believe that a significant part of me needs to be worked upon. I have discovered that not many people strive for excellence in all areas of their lives. Some are excellent in one skill and careless in others. Others give their best at work but are sloppy at home. I have always put high regard for my family and work and maintain the beam to stay balanced. I always give my relationships and career goals equal and prior attention. A balanced life is what everyone else needs.  I make sure to attend to all-important family affairs without compromising my duties at work. I make sure that jobs on deck are delegated, if not, I must accomplish the tasks before the scheduled vacation leave/leave of absence.

I know I am a good listener, and I am quite a talker, which means I don’t only speak when spoken to. I make sure to contribute my own ideas, but I keep quiet when others are speaking. I think listening is a greater expression of love and concern. When I am in a group, I classify myself under the “laughing section” joining others having a showdown of good, clean humor. I am a perfectionist, such that I want to make sure of the things I am about to do, even the thoughts I am about to speak. A perfectionist in this case may be the reason why I am afraid to commit mistakes whenever I say something.  

There was a time when I was requested by a friend to answer a survey regarding Spirituality.  I was asked to rank these three: God, work, and family. This is what I answered: First, God; second, Family; and third, Work. I said God should always come first, followed by family, then work. I am not saying that work should be the least prioritized, but before work, God and family should come first. We live because of God's love and we work because of our family. God has been so good. Building a good relationship with God is a top priority for anyone believing in God; everyone should treat it as the most important task and as their major life event. If we do not have a normal relationship with God, then we do not deserve to be called believers—that is why establishing a good relationship with God is so important

Also, I am a nature lover. I believe nature restores and nature heals. In one study in Mind Organization (2007), 95% of those interviewed said their mood improved after spending time outside, charging from depressed, stressed, and anxious to calmer and more balanced. Other studies by Ulrich, Kim, and Cervinka (2012) show that time in nature or scenes of nature are associated with positive mood and psychological well-being, meaningfulness, and vitality.  I believe that the beauty of nature reduces anger, fear, and stress and increases pleasant feelings. It does not only make us feel better emotionally but also contributes to our physical well-being.

Discovering the inner me will make me pursue goodness in life, including my strong faith in my Savior, and of course excellence in work

  

Building a fair Hiring process: Overcoming political challenges

  BLESSIE JANE PAZ B. ANTONIO JANICE D. RASAY Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines Abstract The hiring process and pr...