NHIA JENICA PALACAY MIGUEL
DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION – SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ILOCOS NORTE – DAVILA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Abstract
Efforts
to enhance the competence and performance of administrative staff in the education
sector, reflected in the quality of their work and services, are often hindered
by inefficiency and dissatisfaction. Thus, this article analyzes the
significance and influence of job satisfaction on their performance by
examining factors such as career advancement
possibilities, compensation and recognition, communication and
relationships, and work environment and responsibilities. It also aims to
explore the degree of efficiency and job satisfaction, to empower staff and support initiatives that improve
working environments and promote work-life balance.
Keywords
Administrative Staff;
Education Sector; Efficiency; Job Satisfaction; Career Advancement
Possibilities; Compensation; Recognition; Communication; Relationship; Work Environment;
Responsibilities
Introduction
Administrative staff play an indispensable role in the
daily functioning of schools, as they oversee clerical work, documentation,
financial transactions, and operational coordination that sustain institutional
continuity and effectiveness. With expanding responsibilities, their role gains
heightened significance. Even amid challenges such as restricted resources, excessive
workloads, minimal support, and scarce professional development opportunities, they
steadfastly fulfill their obligations with resolute dedication and loyalty.
Understanding job satisfaction involves recognizing
its essence and underlying factors to enhance efficiency in administrative
staff performance through better work and service quality. Employee engagement
is shaped by a combination of organizational and psychological conditions,
including clearly defined roles, constructive leadership, positive
interpersonal relationships, opportunities for professional growth,
acknowledgment of contributions, and the degree of independence granted in
carrying out assigned tasks. These aspects foster a sense of motivation, value,
and connection among employees, leading to increased productivity and
commitment to organizational goals.
The recruitment, development, and retention of prospective
educational administrators represent critical issues in the Philippine education
sector. Dulog (2024) highlights persistent difficulties, including rundown
school facilities, insufficient school personnel, and resource gaps. Professionalization
is underway, yet surging demand for adaptable leaders in the face of social and
technological evolution is constrained by insufficient numbers of qualified
personnel and funding within institutions.
Addressing these issues demands greater funding from the
government and institutions for staff training, solid organizational backing,
and upgraded research facilities guided by strict rules and ethical standards.
Elevating educational administration quality in the Philippines hinges on
skilled personnel, varied programs, and compelling research incentives.
Efficiency
and job satisfaction
Extensive studies indicate that job satisfaction
significantly shapes employee performance, positioning it as a key determinant
in productivity outcomes. Efficiency among administrative staff refers to their
capacity to optimally leverage resources while executing managerial and
operational tasks to achieve objectives. Meanwhile, job satisfaction emerges
from the interplay of work environment, duties, evaluations, and staff
responses, often described as a profound sense of "work fulfillment".
Demand Control Theory explains how specific job
characteristics influence employees’ mental well-being, proposing that
excessive workloads, unclear job expectations, limited advancement
opportunities, and sustained occupational pressures contribute to heightened
workplace stress when not counteracted by sufficient regulation or
reinforcement. (Ankomah, R.O., & Dzikunu, C.K., 2024). Administrative staff
working under demanding conditions and poorly defined responsibilities often
experience reduced efficiency and diminished job satisfaction, which may
manifest as increased occupational strain and reduced work effectiveness. (Bangalan,
2025; Edwards, R., 2018; Pa-ay, J.L., 2025). The theory links job stress to both performance and
satisfaction, noting that administrative personnel perform duties more
effectively and efficiently under low stress, with recognition, rewards, and
skill-building training from management. It also emphasizes that formal organizational structures, well-defined roles
and responsibilities, and effective coordination within institutions can
substantially enhance outcomes for administrative staff. Early detection of
personnel encountering such challenges facilitates the implementation of
refined selection procedures or robust primary prevention initiatives by the education
sector.
Moreover,
an individual's overall job satisfaction is determined by the magnitude of the
discrepancy between their expectations or desires for specific job facets and
the outcomes actually attained. The subjective importance ascribed to each
facet serves as a critical moderator, amplifying the intensity of resultant
satisfaction or dissatisfaction. As articulated by Omoz-Oarhe et al. (2022),
the valence individuals attach to particular job attributes exerts a
disproportionate influence on affective responses: high-valence attributes
elicit pronounced elevations in satisfaction when expectations are met and
correspondingly severe decrements when unmet, relative to low-valence
attributes.
According
to Locke’s Range of Affect Theory (1976), the level of importance individuals
assign to particular job elements significantly influences their emotional
responses, such that unmet expectations in highly valued areas tend to produce
stronger dissatisfaction than unmet expectations in less valued aspects of
work. Within the context of administrative work, this framework enables staff
to identify which aspects of their roles most strongly affect their
satisfaction or dissatisfaction, allowing organizations to address critical
concerns more effectively (Kurniawati et al., 2024).
Administrative
staff performance has been widely examined in organizational studies due to its
influence on institutional effectiveness and individual professional growth.
Rather than viewing performance as a single construct, scholars describe it as
a multidimensional outcome shaped by an employee’s ability to meet assigned
responsibilities, the quality of task execution, and the level of effort
exerted within a given timeframe. Performance is further influenced by personal
competencies, motivation, work attitudes, and the extent to which individuals
understand their roles and expectations. From an organizational perspective,
performance also reflects how effectively employees align their actions with
institutional objectives and administrative directives, highlighting the
importance of structured systems, guidance, and leadership support in achieving
desired outcomes (Paais & Pattiruhu, 2020; Sabuhari et al., 2020; Wolor et
al., 2022; Mohzana et al., 2025).
Performance
appraisals benefit both organizations and their employees by delivering
feedback on performance, which is vital for strategic development planning. A
well-designed performance evaluation system relies on clearly defined criteria,
measurable and attainable indicators, and alignment with actual job functions
to ensure fairness, accuracy, and practical usefulness in assessing employee
contributions. Performance evaluation approaches divide into past-oriented and
future-oriented categories, each with distinct advantages and limitations.
Past-oriented methods encompass checklists, rating scales, and critical
incident techniques, whereas future-oriented techniques include
self-assessments, psychological testing, and management by objectives. This
aims to enhance institutional efficiency by addressing misalignments in
employee output, while providing structured feedback to boost engagement and
clarify expectations. They enable informed decisions on career progression,
rewards, and corrective actions, ultimately fostering individual and collective
improvement.
Conclusion
Efficiency
and job satisfaction among administrative staff in the education sector are
closely linked, with structured support systems playing a pivotal role in
enhancing both. Effective administrative reinforcement reduces stress levels,
minimizes operational errors, and enhances performance, leading to better
retention. Instrumental support, such as tangible resources and workload
assistance, alongside emotional and informational support, demonstrates a
stronger tie to elevated satisfaction than vague encouragement alone among
education personnel. Factors like compensation, advancement prospects, and
colleague interactions further drive overall fulfillment. Focused training,
optimal work settings, and balanced workloads elevate efficiency and morale,
while equitable recruitment, promotions, rewards, and recognition sustain
long-term performance and loyalty. Institutions prioritizing these factors
experience reduced staff turnover and more smoother operations.
This
article aims to shed further light on the critical role and impact of job
satisfaction in driving the performance of administrative staff within the
education sector. Benefits for these professionals should be allocated
proportionally to their contributions toward both the institution and society
broadly, guided by core principles of distributive justice. Far from being mere
peripheral elements, administrative staff represent vital components of the
organizational framework. Instead of being overlooked or taken for granted,
they deserve the essential resources required to produce high-quality work and
services, complemented by empowerment and support to refine their work
environment and achieve work-life harmony.
REFERENCES
Ankomah, R.O. &
Dzikunu, C.K. (2024). Occupational Stress and Administrators’ Levels of Job
Satisfaction in The University of Education, Winneba. International
Multidisciplinary Journal of Research and Education.
02(01). 078-0198. https://doi.org/10.64712/imjre.v2i1.286
Bangalan,
A.C. (2025). Challenges Encountered by the Administrative Officers of the
Department of Education in Lower Apayao. International Journal for
Multidisciplinary Research. 07(03). 1-19. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/3/44606.pdf
Dulog,
S. M. (2024). The Challenges and Opportunities in Educational Administration: A
Perspective from the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of
Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence. 01(03). 79-84. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/186
Edwards,
R. (2018). An Elaboration of the Administrative Theory of the 14 Principles of
Management by Henri Fayol. International Journal for Empirical Education and
Research. 01(01). 41-52. https://doi.org/10.35935/edr/21.5241
Kurniawati et al. (2024). The Influence of Job
Satisfaction on Employee Performance of Educational Staff. European Journal
of Business and Management Research. 09(03). 148-156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.3.2326
Mohzana,
M., Fahrurrozi, M., & Abdurrosyidin, R. (2025). Improving the Performance
of Administrative Staff: An Analysis of Evaluation and Its Implications in
Mataram City High Schools. Educational Process: International Journal. 15.
01-16. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.117
Omoz-Oarhe
et al. (2022). The Effect of Job Satisfaction on Employees’ Productivity. International
Journal of Management, Social Sciences, Peace and Conflict Studies. 05(02).
371-384. https://www.ijmsspcs.com/index.php/IJMSSPCS/article/view/371
Paais,
M., & Pattiruhu, J. R. (2020). Effect of Motivation, Leadership, and
Organizational Culture on Satisfaction and Employee Performance. Journal of
Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 07(08), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO8.577
Pa-ay,
J.L. (2025). Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction: A Study Among
Non-Teaching Personnel in the DepEd District of Bokod. International Journal
of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 04(02). 1298-1307. https://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0402121
Sabuhari, R., Sudiro, A., Irawanto, D. W., &
Rahayu, M. (2020). The effects of human resource flexibility, employee
competency, organizational culture adaptation and job satisfaction on employee
performance. Management Science Letters. 10. 1777-1786. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.1.001
Wolor, C. W., Ardiansyah, A., Rofaida, R., Nurkhin, A., & Rababah, M. A. (2022). Impact of Toxic Leadership on Employee Performance. Health Psychology Research. 10(4). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.52965/001C.57551
https://demolitionnutsgrease.com/q9h97sj5?key=23b279e99ed6a529a30f577cdce2aeb9