SONNY P. DIZA, MBA
DIVINE WORD COLLEGE OF LAOAG
When using social media, one should consider
basic human rights, personal rights, privacy rights, and the treatment of
personal information, etc. while also obeying all relevant laws and regulations
as well as the Code of Conduct.
-Sumitomo Rubber Group, Social Media Policy (#129, Financial Times Global 500, 2013
(The content of the paper belongs to the author)
Abstract
Social
media use is pervasive across all age groups, social classes, and cultural
divides. Social media usage has increased dramatically in recent years. Social
media platforms are increasingly used as vital hubs for networking,
socializing, and, most significantly, reflecting on many facets of everyday
life. As a result, these online venues include enormous amounts of organically
occurring data on a range of subjects, including consumer behaviour, attitudes
toward pro-environmental measures, and political preferences and perspectives.
Nevertheless, the rising usage of digital media is accompanied by ethical and
privacy concerns. These privacy concerns may have significant effects on one's
professional, personal, and security life. Due to the nature of social media,
which is to share information, achieving total privacy is exceedingly
challenging. Individuals who use social media must be willing to disregard some
personal and privacy restrictions, making them somewhat vulnerable. Weak
privacy protections for people in this area have led to unethical and undesired
actions that have led to privacy and security breaches, particularly for the foremost
vulnerable users.
The ethical issues surrounding a person's right to
privacy when they are endangered by technology will be covered in this article.
In addition, it also discusses how unethical use of social media can impact
users’ privacy, particularly in business ethics.
Keywords: ethics, privacy violation, social media
Introduction
According to Britz, the so-called information age, in which economic
activity is mostly information-based, is the era in which we currently live (an
age of informationalization). This is a result of technological advancement and
application. The main characteristics of this period can be summed up as an
increase in knowledge workers, a more open world in terms of communication (the
global village/Gutenberg galaxy), and internationalization (trans-border flow
of data). The twenty-first century could be referred to as the "boom"
time for social networking as the use of social media is expanding quickly. Communication
at home and work has undergone a substantial transformation because of social
media. Additionally, social media platforms offer a lot of potential for
businesses in terms of recruiting, organizational learning, public relations,
and internal and external communications. As of February 2019, according to
reports from Smart Insights, over 3.484 billion people were using social media.
According to the Smart Insight survey, social media users are increasing by 9%
yearly, and it is predicted that this growth will continue. Social media users currently make up 45% of
the world's population. The "Millennial Generation," or those who
became adults at the turn of the twenty-first century, and "Digital
Natives," a group of people who were either born or who have grown up in
the digital era and are familiar with the various technologies and systems, are
the most active users of social media. These user groups use social media platforms
for a wide range of activities, including marketing, news gathering, education,
healthcare, civic involvement, and political activity. (Chaffey, 2019)
What is Privacy?
According to dictionary.com,
the definition of privacy is the right to enjoy freedom from unauthorized
intrusion is the negative right of all human beings. Privacy is defined as the
right to be left alone, to be free from secret surveillance, or unwanted
disclosure of personal data or information by government, corporation, or individual.
(Barrett-Maitland, N., &
Lynch, J.,2020) Privacy is the ability to control information about oneself as
well as the freedom from surveillance from being followed, tracked, watched,
and eavesdropped on. In this regard, ignoring privacy rights often leads to
encroachment on natural rights. (Baase, 2012: Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J.,2020)
Peace of mind
and solitude can be attained through privacy or even just the awareness that
one has this right. People can breathe easily in this quiet since it is free
from interruptions and intrusions. According to Richards and Solove (2010)
cited by Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J.(2020), Legal scholar William
Prosser argued that privacy cases can be classified into four related “torts,”
namely:
Intrusion—this can be viewed as
encroachment (physical or otherwise) on one's liberties/solitude in a highly
offensive way.
Privacy facts—making public, private
information about someone that is of no “legitimate concern” to anyone.
False light—making public false and
“highly offensive” information about others.
Appropriation—stealing someone’s identity
(name, likeness) to gain advantage without the permission of the individual.
As technology permeates every aspect of daily life,
information privacy is becoming increasingly difficult to protect as more and
more data is gathered, transported, and analyzed for both good and bad
purposes. As technology attempts to blur the barrier between the private and
public spheres, it becomes more of a sensitive subject. Even established
businesses in the field are struggling to keep clients' personal information
secure. As a result, privacy has evolved into the most complex consumer
protection issue in the digital age, even though it is fundamentally a human
right. (Grover, 2015).
The breach of informational privacy can impact solitude
(the right to be left alone), intimacy (the right not to be monitored), and
anonymity (the right to have no public personal identity and by extension
physical privacy impacted). The right to control access to facts or personal
information in our view is a natural, inalienable right and everyone should
have control over who sees their personal information and how it is
disseminated. (Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J., 2020).
It might be argued that privacy establishes the
boundaries for participation and disengagement and is a culturally universal
requirement for healthy connections between people. Because it is necessary for
the growth of specific types of human connections, intimacy, and trust, privacy
can also be seen as an instrumental good. However, due to ongoing monitoring and the
inability to gauge how much engagement there is with multiple publics, achieving
privacy is much more challenging. (Johnson DG, 2004: Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J.,
2020). According to Baase (2012), some detractors contend that privacy is a
universal right and that it offers a defense against antisocial acts including
deceit, misinformation, and fraud.
Because it is a prerequisite for other rights like
freedom and individual autonomy, privacy is a crucial right. Thus, there is a
connection between personal freedom, privacy, and human dignity. Respecting
someone's privacy is the same as recognizing their right to freedom and their
status as independent human beings.
It is also a basic obligation to respect someone's
privacy. To put it another way, it is not a requirement that cannot be waived.
There are two possible examples. First off, the police have the right to invade
a criminal's privacy by eavesdropping on them or taking their personal
belongings (McGarry, 1993). To maintain law and order in society, a government
is also permitted to collect sensitive information from its inhabitants (Ware,
1993). Social responsibility thus limits the right to privacy (as a
manifestation of human freedom).
Privacy is neither secrecy nor security
According to Grover (2015), Privacy is defined as that that can be kept private and is permitted by society, whereas secrecy is anything that is not permitted to be kept private yet is being done so by someone. Privacy is essential for reputation, whereas secrecy hurts it. Although privacy is not security, it is quite near to it because privacy is jeopardized when it is violated. Security places a greater emphasis on defending data against hostile assaults and the commercial use of stolen data, as is done by some businesses with a concentration on technology. When we say security is required for data protection, we don't mean it's enough to handle privacy.
Social Media
Employee usage of boundary-crossing
technologies in the office for personal purposes is common, whether it means
utilizing corporate computers to check personal e-mail and social network
accounts or sending text messages on employer-provided communications devices (Abril
et.al., 2012). According to Boulianne (2015), social media has become one of
the most widely used Internet services worldwide due to the exponential rise of
its usage over the past ten years, offering new opportunities to "see and
be seen." Social media use has altered the nature of communication, which
has affected moral standards and behaviour. The extraordinary rate of user
growth has led to changes in areas such as civic and political engagement,
privacy, and safety, as well as a decrease in the use of other media. (McCay-Peet, L.,
& Quan-Haase, A. ,2017).
The use of social media is a developing
phenomenon in modern culture. Social media sites give users a simple way to
connect with and grow their networks of friends, family, and relevant
professionals. Almost anyone's interests can be accommodated by online
communities of interest. Social media platforms are being used more and more
often by people as a means of communication, information exchange, and - most
crucially for this text - the sharing of attitudes and behaviors on a vast
array of issues. Online services that let users build "public,
semi-public," or both types of profiles can be referred to as social media
sites. Users have the option of creating individual profiles and/or joining a
group of individuals they may know offline. They also offer ways to establish
online relationships. People have access to information about their contacts
through these virtual friendships, including background knowledge, interests,
and location. Different tools are available on social networking sites to help
in communication. Chat rooms, blogs, private messages, public comments, methods
for posting content from outside the website, and sharing of films and photos
are some of these. As a result, social media has fundamentally altered how
individuals interact with one another and build connections. (Gil de Zúñiga, H.,
Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S., 2012).
Social media and Privacy
Social media and
the information/digital era have “redefined” privacy. Although technology has a
significant impact on information gathering, storage, retrieval, and
distribution, its principal ethical implications pertain to accessibility (or
lack thereof) and information manipulation. It makes it possible for more
people to receive information simultaneously and more widely. Inferentially,
more people will find it simpler to access a person's private information.
However, a person can be prevented from accessing essential information in
electronic form using several security precautions, like passwords.
Christians
(1991) describes technology use as a process that is loaded with values. Even
according to Kluge (1994), technology has altered the ethical implications of a
document's ontological character. He especially alludes to the technological
manipulation of information when he uses this phrase. On the other hand, Brown
(1990) rightly argues that we do not need to "rethink our moral principles"
as a result of the ethical issues brought on by the use of technology.
Because
sharing information is the main means of engaging in social communities on
social networking sites (SNSs), individuals' ability to maintain their privacy
is highly dependent on these networks. Users of these platforms are responsible
for guarding their information against third-party data collection and managing
their accounts, making SNS privacy "multifaceted." However, users of
SNSs seem to be more willing to divulge personal and private information than
users of other websites. This can be related to the overall sense of belonging,
comfort, and family that various mediums convey. Designers of social networking
sites do not prioritize privacy measures, and few young adolescent users alter
the default privacy settings of their accounts. (Barrett-Maitland, N., Barclay,
C., & Osei-Bryson, K. M., 2016).
The impact of the use of technology on the
privacy of people manifests itself in a variety of areas. These areas include,
inter alia the following:
a. The electronic monitoring of people in the
workplace. This relates to personal information, and this is done by so-called
electronic eyes. The justification by companies for the use of such technology
is to increase productivity. However, Stair (1992) makes it apparent that there
is an ethical issue with the employment of these technologies when discussing
this practice. According to him, these devices pose a threat to people's
privacy at work. Additionally, it can cause a sense of dread and of constantly
being watched or the "panopticon phenomenon."
b. The interception and reading of E-mail
messages. This raises an ethical issue about an individual's private conversation.
Technically speaking, it is possible to intercept email messages, and companies
typically justify reading them because they view the technology infrastructure
(email) as a resource belonging to the company rather than the individual.
Additionally, messages are intercepted to check on people to see whether they
use the facility for personal reasons or to perform their jobs.
c. Another major threat to privacy is the rise
of so-called hackers and crackers who break into computer systems (Benjamin,
1991). This coincides with the shift in ethical values and the emergence of the
cyberpunk culture with the motto of "information wants to be free".
Social Media and Ethics
The
word "ethics" is derived from the Greek word ethos (character), and
the Latin word 'mores' (customs). Derived from the Greek word
"ethos," which means "way of living", ethics is a branch of
philosophy that is concerned with human conduct. It consists of a code of
conduct for human beings living in a society. Ethics examines the rational
justification for our moral judgments; it studies what is morally right or
wrong, just or unjust. Together, they combine to define how individuals choose
to interact with one another. In philosophy, ethics defines what is good for
the individual and society and establishes the nature of duties that people owe
to themselves and one another. It aims at individual good as well as a social
good, the good of mankind as a whole
(http://www.kkhsou.in/main/philosophy/nature_ethics.html#:~:text=The%20scope%20of%20ethics%20indicates,or%20wrongness%20of%20human%20actions
It
is also defined as the science of the highest good. Mackenzie (1901) defines
ethics as "the study of what is right or good in human conduct" or
the "science of the ideal involved in human life". So, ethics is the
study that determines the rightness or wrongness of actions.
According
to Nate (2018), in the domain of social media, some of the ethical questions
that must be contemplated and ultimately answered are:
a. Can this post be
regarded as oversharing?
b. Has the information
in this post been distorted in any way?
c. What impact will
this post have on others?
One of the largest age groups using social
media is those between the ages of 8 and 15. These young people, who range in
age from 8 to 15, are still learning how to connect with those around them and
determining the moral principles they will uphold. Their interactions with the
world around them will be influenced by these moral principles. The moral
principles that serve as the foundation for our ethical ideals were typically
imparted to us by a person or group of people, such as our parents, guardians,
religious organizations, or instructors, to mention a few. Many members of
Generation Y, or "Digital Babies," are "newbies," but they
still need to decide for themselves how much responsibility to exhibit when
utilizing the various social media platforms. This involves taking into account
how a post will affect their own and/or other people's lives. They must also be
aware that when they sign up for a social media network, they are becoming a
member of a community where specific conduct is expected. They cannot be
expected to have that level of maturity at that age, which is necessary for
such responsibility. (Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J.,2020)
Applicable Ethical Norms
Applicable ethical norms which can act as
guidelines, as well as instruments of measurement, must be formulated to
address these ethical issues. The following norms can be distinguished: truth,
freedom, and human rights. ( Britz, J.J., n.d)
Truth. Truth as an ethical norm has a dual ethical
application. Firstly, it serves as a norm for the factual correctness of the
information. As a norm, it thus guides the information professional regarding
the accurate and factually correct handling of private information. In the
second-place truth is an expression of ethical virtues such as openness,
honesty, and trustworthiness.
Freedom. According to this norm, a
person has the freedom to make choices in terms of freedom of privacy and
freedom from intrusion. As a norm, however, it may not become absolutized. Therefore,
the choice of privacy from intrusion may not restrict the freedom of others.
Human rights. This norm is
closely related to freedom but can be regarded as a more concretely applicable
norm. Applied to privacy it means the juridical acknowledgement and protection
of a person's right to privacy. As an individual human right, it also protects
the individual from unlawful interference from society (amongst others the
state) in the private life of an individual.
Conclusion
In the information age of
today, one's digital imprint can make or break them and determine whether or
not they fulfil their life's goals. Social media contacts and unethical behaviour
can have significant effects on a person's career and social life. Internet
posting signals the "end of forgetting," thus it's crucial to use it
responsibly. The irresponsible use of social media has ramifications for
privacy and may lead to real-world and virtual security breaches. Social media
use can also lead to a loss of privacy because many users are forced to share
information that they otherwise would not. If users don't properly control
their usage of social media, it can divulge information that could lead to
privacy violations. Therefore, it is crucial to remind users of the risks and
consequences of disclosing sensitive information in this setting and to promote
caution in guarding users' privacy on these platforms. This might lessen the
use of these platforms for immoral and reckless purposes and promote safer social
interactions. Social media usage ought to be guided by universally applicable
moral and ethical standards that foster healthy connections among people of
different racial, cultural, religious, and socioeconomic backgrounds.
The processing of
information via technology raises significant issues with an individual's right
to privacy. The rights to freedom and human autonomy are closely related to
this one. These issues mostly concern the availability of information and its
manipulation. This is especially important for information professionals who
work with sensitive personal data. The standards of liberty, truth, and human
rights can be used to provide actionable rules for dealing with these issues.
References
Abril, Patricia and
Levin, Avner and Del Riego, Alissa (January 18, 2012). Blurred Boundaries:
Social Media Privacy and the Twenty-First-Century Employee. American Business
Law Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 63-124, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2004438
Chaffey D. (2019). Global Social Media Research. Smart Insights retrieved
from:
https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/
Baase S. (2012) A Gift of Fire. Upper Saddle River,
New Jersey: Pearson Education Limited (Prentice Hall)
Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J. (2020). Social Media, Ethics
and the Privacy Paradox. In C. Kalloniatis, & C. Travieso-Gonzalez (Eds.),
Security and Privacy From a Legal, Ethical, and Technical Perspective.
IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90906
Barrett-Maitland, N., Barclay, C., & Osei-Bryson,
K. M. (2016). Security in social networking services: a value-focused thinking
exploration in understanding users’ privacy and security concerns. Information
Technology for Development, 22(3), 464-486.
Benjamin, L.M. (1991). Privacy, computers, and
personal information: Towards equality and equity in an information age.
Communications and the Law, 13 (2): 3-16.
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and
participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, communication
& society, 18(5), 524-538.
Britz, J.J. (n.d). Technology
as a threat to privacy: ethical challenges to the information profession.
Department of
Information Science University of Pretoria 0002 Pretoria, South Africa
retrieved from http://web.simmons.edu/~chen/nit/NIT'96/96-025-Britz.html
Christians, C.G.
(1991). Information ethics in a complicated age. In Ethics and the Librarian.
Proceedings of the Allerton Park Institute, 29-31 October 1989, University of
Illinois, Graduate School of Library, edited by F.W. Lancaster. Vol. 31. Also
In Cochrane, J. (1991). Hellhound on my trail. Ethics and librarianship. New
Zealand Libraries, 46 (11):2 6-31.
Grover, Vijay. (2015). Technology:
A Tangible Threat To Our Privacy. Research Journals Journal of Sociology.
3. 1-9.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., &
Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media is used for news and individuals' social
capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of computer-mediated
communication, 17(3), 319-336.
Johnson DG. (2004). Computer ethics.
In: The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education (Prentice Hall). pp. 65-75
Kluge, E.H.W. (1994).
Health information, fair information principles, and ethics. Methods of
Information in Medicine, 33: 336-345.
McGarry, K. (1993). The
Changing Context of Information. An Introductory Analysis. 2nd ed.
London: Library Association Publishing.
Mackenzie, J. S. (1901). A manual of ethics. Hinds &
Noble.
McCay-Peet, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2017). What is social media and what
questions can social media research help us answer? The SAGE handbook of social
media research methods, 13-26.
Nates C. (2018). The Dangers of
Oversharing of Social Media. Pure Moderation. Retrieved from:
https://www.puremoderation.com/single-post/The-Dangers-of-Oversharing-on-Social-Media
Richards, N. M.,
& Solove, D. J. (2010). Prosser's privacy law: A mixed legacy.
Calif. L. Rev., 98, 1887.
Stair, R.M. (1992). Principles of
Information Systems. A Managerial Approach. Boston: Boyd & Fraser.
loopme.com, 5679, RESELLER, 6c8d5f95897a5a3b
Ware, W.H. (1993). The new faces of
privacy. The Information Society, 9 (3): 195-211.