Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Employee Management and Well-being

 Gerlie S. Rimalos

Abstract

The ethical concept of employee management and well-being reminds us that workplaces are more than simply productivity engines; they are also ecosystems in which humans flourish. This concept requires constant vigilance to ensure true fairness and respect for human beings in an ever-changing workplace. This paper focuses on the ethical challenges involved in the management of employees and discusses how to balance human demands with corporate goals, resolve cultural variations, and maintain ethical standards in a continuously changing workplace that necessitates ongoing monitoring and adaptability.

Keywords: ethical concept, well-being, management, employee

Introduction 

Consider a workplace where employees are more than just parts of a machine; they are respected individuals with inherent worth and distinct demands. This is the basis of the ethical concept. It advocates for human dignity, fair treatment, psychological safety, and awareness of the value of work-life balance. Organizations must provide equitable compensation and opportunities for advancement, just as Adams (1963) emphasized the importance of distributive justice. Similarly, Deci and Ryan (2000) emphasize the importance of autonomy and empowerment, pushing for work designs that provide employees with control and meaning, supporting self-determination and well-being

However, the ethical landscape extends beyond individual demands. Leaders have an important role in setting the tone through ethical leadership (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). This entails promoting transparency, open communication, and holding themselves accountable for ethical and sustainable behaviours. It is about establishing a supportive culture in which mental health awareness is actively integrated into how people interact and assist one another (Griffiths & Cooper, 2001).

The challenges abound. Striking a balance between individual well-being and organizational productivity can be tricky, and navigating cultural differences adds a further layer of complexity. Power dynamics within organizations can create ethical dilemmas, demanding constant vigilance to ensure true fairness and respect. 

Nevertheless, the rewards are considerable. Adopting the ethical concept of employee management and well-being is not only a moral obligation but also a wise investment in long-term success. It encourages engaged and productive employees, recruits and keeps top talent, and establishes a reputation as a responsible and ethical firm.

Respect for Humanity and Distributive Justice              

The ideas of distributive justice and respect for humanity are inseparable, producing a complicated yet necessary tapestry for ensuring a just and equitable society. Understanding their complicated relationship is critical for resolving moral issues and developing policies that respect each individual's inherent dignity. 

Respect for humanity is fundamentally based on respecting each individual's intrinsic value and dignity, regardless of their origin, views, or ability. This basic idea, advocated by Kant (1785) and evolving into numerous ethical structures, went beyond legal requirements and required moral respect for each individual's inherent value. Meanwhile, distributive justice addresses the fact that providing employees with equitable wages, perks, and resources appropriate to their efforts and needs boosts morale and promotes well-being (Adams, 1963). Theories like Rawls (1971) emphasize social justice and ensuring basic rights, while Nozick (1974) emphasizes individual rights and fair transactions, adding another layer to the argument. 

Technology also enters the scenario, creating new difficulties and opportunities. The rise of artificial intelligence and algorithmic decision-making raises concerns about how we can assure respect for humanity in the digital era, including challenges such as algorithmic biases and the risk of dehumanization. 

Moreover, achieving distributive justice and respect for humanity needs continual debate, critical thought, and a commitment to removing the processes that promote unfairness. By viewing these notions as interconnected threads rather than separate problems, we may create solutions that address both the material and non-material components of human dignity, striving for a society in which every individual is really appreciated and enabled to thrive.

Autonomy and Control

The notions of autonomy and job control have a long history in the fields of work and health studies. Autonomy is the level to which employees may exert choice in how they accomplish their jobs and is most closely related to ideas that address the difficulty of designing work that is intrinsically motivating, rewarding, and conducive to physical and mental well-being (iloencyclopaedia.org, 2011). 

While the concept of control was essential to one of the most influential theories of occupational stress (Ganster and Schaubroeck, 1991), Furthermore, this concept—often referred to as the Job Decision Latitude Model—inspired many large-scale epidemiological studies that looked at the combined effects of control and a variety of difficult work circumstances on worker health (Karasek, 1979).

Though there is some discussion about how control might affect health outcomes, researchers and behavioural scientists currently regard control as a critical variable that should be taken seriously in any investigation of behavioural work stress conditions.

Transparency Communication in the Ethical Leadership 

In today's challenging and demanding environment, ethical leadership stands as an example of trust and honesty. At its foundation, this concept involves not only moral behavior but also a dedication to transparency and good communication. These critical principles build trust, encourage cooperation, and empower individuals, paving the road for a more equitable and productive environment.

Transparent communication is the process of sharing both positive and negative information upstream, downward, and laterally in such a way that everyone can perceive the reasoning behind the words. A workplace with transparent communication is more collaborative and trustworthy, with information freely shared among employees and across organizational levels. Additionally, it also encourages employees to be more inventive since they are better informed, facilitates open conversation, and enhances idea sharing (Hutchison, 2020). Essentially, transparent communication enables the workplace to be collectively informed of the genuine events inside the firm and to coordinate their activities appropriately.

Health and Safety 

Ethics are an important aspect of health and safety. Health and safety policies and procedures must be founded on ethical values to guarantee that no one is put in danger. Ethical standards may help firms create and maintain a safe working environment for those under their supervision or care.

An ethical approach to health and safety offers various benefits. It contributes to the development of a positive workplace culture that reflects a commitment to employee health and well-being. This may lead to enhanced job satisfaction and morale, as well as higher retention rates because employees are more likely to stay with a company that values their health and safety. Moreover, businesses may foster trust among their employees by encouraging ethical standards. Employees who believe their superior is really concerned about their well-being are more likely to be optimistic and engaged at work. Employees are more motivated and devoted to their jobs, which may lead to increased productivity and higher-quality work (Linkedin.com, 2023).

Conclusion

The ethical concept of employee management and well-being reminds us that workplaces are more than simply productivity engines; they are also ecosystems in which humans flourish. It requires us to turn our emphasis away from profit margins and toward the well-being of the people who enable those profits. Embracing this concept of ethics is more than a feel-good exercise; it is a strategic investment in company success. We gain by promoting respect, autonomy, and well-being because people who feel appreciated, valued, and empowered are more likely to be motivated, creative, and productive. However, dealing with the ethical challenges involved in employee management and well-being presents several obstacles. Balancing human demands with corporate goals, resolving cultural variations, and maintaining ethical standards in an ever-changing workplace necessitates ongoing monitoring and adaptability. 

Furthermore, the ethical concept of employee management and well-being is not an endpoint but rather an ongoing journey. It is about transforming our workplaces into sanctuaries of human dignity, where employees may thrive and contribute their unique abilities while also attaining corporate goals. By embracing this idea of change, we may create a future in which work is more than just a means to an end but rather a source of meaning, joy, and well-being for everyone.

Reference

Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an equity theory of motivation. Behavioral Science, 6(1), 46-56.

 

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

 

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

 

Ganster, DC & Schaubroeck, J. (1991). Work stress and employee health. Journal of Management, 17, 235-271.

 

Griffiths, A., & Cooper, C. L. (2001). Stress at work: Its effects on the individual and organization. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology,16,  227-347.

 

Hutchison, J. (2020). Psychological safety and transparent communication at work: Strengthening collaboration and innovation. [Video]. Zoom. https://worklife.msu.edu/events/psychological-safety-and-transparent-communication-work-strengthening-collaboration-and

 

ILO Encyclopaedia (2011). Autonomy and Control. ILO. https://www.iloencyclopaedia.org

 

Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by J. M. Gregor. Cambridge University Press.

 

Karasek, RA (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-308.

 

Ligtas Consultancy and Training Limited. (2023). Ethics and Morals in Health and Safety - A Guide for Businesses. Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ethics-morals-health-safety-guide-businesses-ligtas-limited-1e

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.

 

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

 

 

‌

 

‌