Popular Posts

Monday, July 21, 2025

Governance and Ethics in Public Accounting Offices

AMOS CHRISTIAN P. ROMERONA, MBA

Abstract

This paper highlights the public accounting office's practices and responsibilities in maintaining legal and ethical accountability. This paper discusses issues of data privacy and communication encountered, such as the sharing of contact numbers without consent. It also provides an overview of the process and fund handling in public offices.

Keywords: Governance, ethics, accounting, public office

Introduction

The accounting office manages records, funds, and transactions based on laws and rules. These follow set duties to ensure proper use of public money. Republic Act 10173 stipulates that personal data must not be shared without the individual's permission. This law applies to all offices that handle forms and files with private details. Republic Act 6713 states that staff must avoid offers or actions that may compromise fair work practices. This includes gifts from suppliers and favours from contractors. These laws aim to guide the conduct of public workers in all duties. Presidential Decree 1445 reminds offices to use funds only for the tasks allowed. Fund 603 must be utilised in the project plan. If staff do not follow rules, the work suffers—delays, errors, and wrong hires block results. Offices must review how rules are applied in daily tasks. The focus must be on steps that ensure control and fairness. The goal is to protect records, funds, and duties from misuse and abuse.

Keywords: Accountability, Public Service, Fund Management, Ethical Conduct, Data Privacy

Blurred Lines: Data Privacy and Ethical Communication in Public Institutions

Under Republic Act No. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012, personal information should not be disclosed or used without consent, particularly in a workplace setting. Unfortunately, this law is not always observed in practice, highlighting the need to promote digital professionalism and more precise communication boundaries within public institutions.

The school administration serves as a central force in managing the institution. However, unethical conduct still arises, including the leaking of mobile numbers. As Administrative support, such actions undermine privacy and damage the office's credibility. This occurs when employees share contact numbers to reduce their workload in handling follow-ups. As a result, suppliers and contractors made unsolicited calls about voucher and payment status.

These calls occurred beyond work hours, including late nights and weekends. Calls should be handled in a proper setting, especially when they involve payment processes. Information of this nature should not be discussed through random phone calls. Such practices can compromise the institution's reputation and the integrity of its financial operation. At the same time, it blurs the line between professional responsibilities and personal boundaries. It can become unclear whether such levels of access and urgency fall within the scope of one's duty or cross professional and ethical boundaries.

Exercising discretion in determining the relevance of messages is a critical aspect in maintaining professional boundaries and ensuring that integrations align with organisational priorities. This practice reflects a broader lesson in ethical behaviour within an organisation—the importance of setting boundaries, respecting time, and acting with discernment. Ethical communication means being thoughtful, respectful, and professional in choosing how and when to respond. It means focusing on tasks and interactions that uphold organisational values and promote a respectful, efficient workplace.

Transparency and Integrity in Government Disbursements

Under Section 7(d) of RA 6713, "Public officials and employees shall not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or anything of monetary value from any person in the course of their official duties or in connection with any operation being regulated by, or any transaction which may be affected by, the functions of their office."

This provision is relevant, as we are directly involved in processing disbursement vouchers and handling financial transactions. There have been instances where suppliers or contractors attempt to offer gifts or cash incentives in exchange for expedited processing of their DVs. These incidents occurred through phone calls and personal interaction. Accepting such offers not only violates ethical standards but also undermines the fairness and transparency upheld in the conduct of public sector finance. If this happens, some transactions may be delayed. This creates perceptions of favouritism or corruption that compromise the office's integrity.

All transactions must be processed strictly by established policies, complete documentation, and merit, without regard for personal connections. Within the accounting office, personnel serve not merely in administrative clerical capacities, but as frontliners in upholding the ethical standard. The acceptance of gifts or personal favours has no place in a public academic institution, where transparency, accountability, and student welfare must take precedence. This ethical principle is especially critical when suppliers or contractors attempt to influence outcomes, making impartiality and professional integrity essential at all times.

Trust Receipts and Ethical Accountability in Project Fund Management

Trust Receipts, formally recognised as Fund 603 under the Unified Account Code Structure (UACS), refer to projects financed by private entities, non-government organisations, or other government agencies. These funds are not considered part of the agency's regular income and must be utilised strictly for their intended purpose. Under Presidential Decree No. 1445, the Government Auditing Code of the Philippines, Section 7 states that government funds must be used only for their intended purpose. Section 16 states that trust funds must be separately recorded and used strictly for their intended purpose.

Transactions under this fund must fully comply with laws, regulations, and documentation requirements. Project leaders must ensure that every transaction, notably the purchase of supplies and materials, is properly coordinated with the accounting office. In-charge bookkeepers are responsible for validating documents and ensuring that disbursements are aligned with the approved budget. Failure to do so may result in misuse of funds. This can damage the institution's reputation and undermine the trust of funding agencies.

The project involves deploying project-based teams. Project leaders are tasked with hiring project-based personnel through fair and ethical hiring practices to promote transparency and merit-based selection. These personnel must understand that their work is based on a limited budget and specific project targets. A clear understanding of contract terms is necessary to ensure alignment with the project's scope, timeline, and financial limits. Project leaders must document and track work performance consistently to avoid delays in payment processing. Failure to do so can result in incomplete or inconsistent records, which may lead to operational issues. These lapses reflect weaknesses in project oversight and affect overall implementation. Each step in the process requires careful attention to ensure that records accurately reflect actual output and timelines. All documents must support the legitimacy of work done within the approved budget.

Collaboration among the Accounting Office funding sources and project leaders is critical. Proper coordination ensures a smooth flow of financial documentation, reducing the risk of payment delays. Errors in documentation can be avoided when roles are clearly defined and followed. When each party fulfills its responsibilities, the process becomes efficient and transparent. Clear guidelines must be followed from hiring to evaluation to support accountability. Timely action supports project success within budget and schedule.

Conclusion

This paper discusses key issues in data handling, fund use, and staff conduct in public accounting offices. It explained how sharing contact numbers without consent affects privacy and leads to calls outside work hours. This practice blurs the line between personal space and work duties. It confuses and weakens trust in the process. Staff must adhere to established rules of communication and protect private information at all times.

The paper also explained how some suppliers offer gifts to speed up disbursement. This action breaks rules and creates bias in payment processing. It leads to unfair results and disrupts the workflow. Staff must reject all offers linked to their role. Each transaction must be based on clear rules and complete records. Work must be done without personal gain or external pressure.

The study also covered Fund 603. This fund is used for projects with support from other groups. The rule is to use it only for what is planned. PD 1445 requires complete records and proper use of all funds. Weak checks, incorrect paperwork, and delays reveal gaps in the system. These gaps affect the outcome of the work. Project leaders must be familiar with each step and follow through on each task. Staff must track all work and ensure that each step aligns with the plan.

Clear rules guide all actions in the accounting office. Each role must be clear. Each staff member must act based on the task at hand, not on personal favours. Funds must be used with care. Data must be kept safe. Work must be tracked and checked. All actions must follow the law and order. When each part is done with care, the whole process stays fair. The goal is to build trust through clear steps, actual work, and complete care in all tasks.

Republic of the Philippines. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173). Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/

Republic of the Philippines. (1978). Government Auditing Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 1445). Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1978/06/11/presidential-decree-no-1445/

Republic of the Philippines. (1989). Republic Act No. 6713: Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. Office of the Ombudsman. https://www.ombudsman.gov.ph/docs/republicacts/Republic_Act_No_6713.pdf

 

 

 

  

https://nightmarenomad.com/q9h97sj5?key=23b279e99ed6a529a30f577cdce2aeb9

No comments:

Post a Comment

A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD: EXPLORING THE ETHICAL PREDICAMENT OF SENIOR-BASED AGAINST PERFORMANCE-BASED PROMOTIONS IN THE WORKPLACE

  By Zet Bruceton L. Pasion Master’s in Business Administration Abstract             This paper examines the ethical tensions between th...