Popular Posts

Saturday, August 8, 2020

Leaders: Why do we need them in an organization?

LEADERS: WHY DO WE NEED THEM IN AN ORGANIZATION?

SONNY P. DIZA, MBA

                                                     DIVINE WORD COLLEGE OF LAOAG 

"The true mark of a leader is the willingness to stick with a bold course of action — an unconventional business strategy, a unique product-development road map, a controversial marketing campaign — even as the rest of the world wonders why you're not marching in step with the status quo. In other words, real leaders are happy to zig while others zag. They understand that in an era of hyper-competition and non-stop disruption, the only way to stand out from the crowd is to stand for something special."
-Bill Taylor

Abstract

The organization of today does not have the luxury of stability since it faces an ever increasing change in markets, customers and technology. It needs to accept, adopt and implement changes in the business model according to changing trends, technologies, customer preferences and future concerns (Sarna,SK, 2015).  Making decisions is guided by the values and the question is about the values of the current "leaders". Many organizations have fallen into disrespectful leadership by leaders, according to them, are the leaders who bring growth or decline of effectiveness in the organization. The leader as a person in charge or as a change agent can manage an organization or the process of organizational change more effectively and successfully if he/she is capable and competent. Organizational change is a demand of the day, and needed for organizations to survive. Naturally, the question arises. "What role does the leader play in enhancing the organization's effectiveness?" Does the style of leadership guide the structure and culture of the organization? Leaders have very different ways of directing a team, a division, or a company. Some are subdued and analytical; others are charismatic and go with their gut. And different of situations call for different types of leadership. According to Goleman (1999), effective leaders are alike in one crucial way: they all have a high degree of what has come to be known as emotional intelligence.  This article discusses the importance and role that the leader plays in the organization, its qualities and characteristic

Keywords: leader, leadership, roles, qualities, characteristic

 Introduction

An organization is considered to be effective if it finds the balance between the demands of owners, employees, customers, community and the needs of the employees. The leader plays a key role in the orientation and direction of the organization which is the one that sets the vision and mission of the organization and others follow it. So, an appropriate leadership style influence and ensure the prosperity and the economic growth of both organization and employees. One important aspect is the way it treats and orients human resources and their involvement in making decisions. Leadership is one of the main factors in bringing positive change to the organization; if there is no leadership in the organization they will not be able to change in the direction they desire and could experience negative change instead. (Meraku, 2017)

Leadership is critical to business and to life. There has been a lot of work done and books written about leadership, yet it is still much undervalued. Most companies spend more time and money training management than they do training leadership. The most successful organizations – whether they are a business, government, community or military – are successful because of great leaders. Of all the skills needed in groups, leadership is the most important

What is a Leader?

A leader is the one who guides or inspires others in action or opinion; one who takes the lead in any enterprise or movement; one who is “followed”. Leader is a role (Rush, 2012). A leader is the one in the charge, the person who convinces other people to follow. A great leader inspires confidence in other people and moves them to action. "The leader is defined as any person who influences individuals and groups within the organization, helps them in defining objectives and guides them towards achieving these goals" (Nahavandi, 2003). The perception of the leader in many successful companies consists of three elements on which other elements can be raised. These elements are: For leaders to be visible, the importance of the leader to be visible is based on Lord Sieff's statement: "Being an effective leader should see, and better than ever seeing in action". Leaders offer a clear misunderstanding, who first and foremost trust the people themselves and encourage others to do so. (Meraku , 2017). 

Qualities That Define a Good Leader

 

 A great leader is always able to lead a team to success, regardless of the situation that they are facing. In order to help you achieve better results for your company and make you a better leader, here are some key leadership qualities that every good leader should possess or learn from. These qualities are the foundation of a good leadership. While some of these leadership qualities may be more naturally present in the personality of a leader, it is definitely something you can develop and strengthen over time. (https://inside.6q.io/qualities-that-define-a-good-leader/)

 

1. Honesty

One of the leadership qualities that define a good leader is honesty. When you are responsible for a team of people, it is important to be straightforward. Your company and its employees are a reflection of yourself, and if you make honest and ethical behaviour as a key value, your team will follow. Leader should remember to lead by example.

 “A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way.” – John C. Maxwell

 

 

 

2. Delegate

Regardless of the situation and position you are in, always remember that you can’t do everything on your own. Good leaders recognize that delegation does more than simply passing the task to someone else. It is trusting and believing that your employees are able to handle the task given to them.

Delegating to others shows that you have confidence in their abilities, and this can result in a positive morale in the workplace. Your employees want to feel appreciated and trusted. So by giving them a task, they would generally feel honored that they got selected and they would feel the importance of having them around.

 

3. Communication

Communication is the key to success, said everyone. Without clear communication, your employees will have trouble to understand your mission, goals, and vision.

Good communication is a leadership attribute for a number of reasons. Communication should be consistent when it comes to establishing work expectations or giving constructive feedback. With great communication, your employees will have a broad understanding to what they are working for.

“It is better to lead from behind and to put others in front, especially when you celebrate victory when nice things occur. You take the front line when there is danger. Then people will appreciate your leadership.” -Nelson Mandela

 

4. Confidence

Another one of the leadership qualities, is having confidence. There may be days where the future of your brand is cloudy or the monthly sales do not look promising. Any company or businesses would have gone through these issues before; so it is not something new.

As a leader, it is your responsibility to maintain the team morale and keep moving forward. Keep your confidence level up and assure everyone that setbacks being looked into. By staying calm and confident, the team would not worry as they put their trust in you. 

5. Commitment

Nothing shows commitment like getting your hands dirty with the rest of the employees. There is no greater motivation than seeing their leader working alongside everyone else. By proving your commitment to the company and especially your team, you will not only earn the respect of your team, but will also instill that same hardworking drive among your staff.

Showing your commitment sets the example for others to follow, and leads to greater loyalty and respect for you as a leader. Set the tone of commitment, and others will follow suit. Remember that if you expect your team to work hard and produce quality work, you would need to lead by example.

 

6. Positive attitude

You want to keep your team motivated towards the continued success of the company, and keep the energy levels up. Whether that means providing snacks, coffee, relationship advice, or even just an occasional beer in the office, remember that everyone on your team is a person. Keep the office mood a fine balance between productivity and playfulness.

If your team is feeling happy and upbeat, chances are they won’t mind staying that extra hour to finish a report, or devoting their best work to the brand.

“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.” -Peter Drucker

7. Creativity

As a good leader is someone the team could look up to for answers or solutions, it is up to you to think outside the box when any issues arise.

You could also gather the team and start brainstorming ideas to build upon some of your ideas. When you get your employees involved in a decision or an idea, they often the importance of their existence in the company. They feel respected and wanted and at times, even looking forward to work. 

8. Inspire

Another quality that defines a good leader is being inspiring. Being able to inspire your team is great for focusing on the company’s vision and goals, but it is also important for the team during their current projects.

When your team are drowning in workload or their morale is low, you as a leader need to be inspiring and start finding ways to inspire your team. It is your job to keep spirits up, and that begins with an appreciation for the hard work that they have put in. Start off by giving words of encouragement once in a while.

 

9. Empathy

Having empathy as a leader goes a long way. Empathy is the ability to understand or feel what other people are experiencing. In other words, they put themselves in other people’s shoe. Extraordinary leaders praise in public and address problems in private.

At times, leaders need to look after their team‘s feelings. The best leaders guide employees through challenges and are always on the lookout for a solution. Instead of making things personal when they encounter problems, or assigning blame to individuals, good leaders look for constructive solutions and focus on moving forward. 

10. Accountability

A good leader takes responsibility for everyone’s performance as well as their own. When things are going well, they praise. However when problems arise, they identify them quickly, seek solutions, and get the team back on track. 

11. Enthusiastic

A good leader is enthusiastic about their work or cause and also about their role as leader. People will respond more openly to a person of passion and dedication. Leaders need to be able to be a source of inspiration, and be a motivator towards the required action or cause.

Although the responsibilities and roles of a leader may be different, the leader needs to be seen to be part of the team working towards the goal. This kind of leader will not be afraid to roll up their sleeves and get dirty.

 

12. Focus and drive

A good leader is generally focused and they are able to think rationally. Not only does a good leader view a situation as a whole, but is able to narrow down the cause as well as find the solution to the problem.

Leaders should also be self-driven to work harder in wanting to achieve better results for the company. They are the driving force in the team and also someone the team could look up to and encourage the rest to work together. “People ask the difference between a leader and a boss. The leader leads, and the boss drives.” -Theodore Roosevelt

 

13. Responsible

The last quality that defines a good leader is being responsible. Great leaders know that when it comes to their company or workplace, they need to take personal responsibility for failure.

A good leader does not make excuses; they take the blame regardless and then work out how to fix the problem as soon as possible. Responsibility is definitely a key leadership attribute.

 

What Are the Characteristics of a Good Leader?

Leaders shape our nations, communities, and organizations. We need good leaders to help guide us and make the essential large-scale decisions that keep the world moving. (https://www.ccl.org/blog/characteristics-good-leader/)

 

 

1. Integrity

The importance of integrity should be obvious. Though it may not necessarily be a metric in employee evaluations, integrity is essential for the individual and the organization. It’s especially important for top-level executives who are charting the organization’s course and making countless other significant decisions. Our research show that integrity may actually be a potential blind spot for organizations. Make sure your organization reinforces the importance of integrity to leaders at various levels.

 

2. Ability to Delegate

Delegating is one of the core responsibilities of a leader, but it can be tricky to delegate effectively. The goal isn’t just to free yourself up — it’s also to enable your direct reports, facilitate teamwork, provide autonomy, lead to better decision-making, and help your direct reports grow. In order to delegate well, you also need to build trust with your team.

 

3. Communication

Effective leadership and effective communication are intertwined. You need to be able to communicate in a variety of ways, from transmitting information to coaching your people. And you must be able to communicate with a range of people across roles, social identities, and more.

 

4. Self-Awareness

While this is a more inwardly focused skill, self-awareness is paramount for leadership. The better you understand yourself, the more effective you can be. Do you know how other people view you, or how you show up at work?

 

5. Gratitude

Giving thanks will actually make you a better leader. Gratitude can lead to higher self-esteem, reduced depression and anxiety, and even better sleep. Few people regularly say “thank you” at work, even though most people say they’d be willing to work harder for an appreciative boss.

 

6. Learning Agility

Learning agility is the ability to know what to do when you don’t know what to do. If you’re a “quick study” or are able to excel in unfamiliar circumstances, you might already be learning agile. But anybody can foster learning agility through practice, experience, and effort. Explore how great leaders are great learners, with strong learning agility to get started.

 

7. Influence

For some people, “influence” feels like a dirty word. But being able to convince people through logical, emotional, or cooperative appeals is a component of being an inspiring, effective leader. Influence is quite different from manipulation, and it needs to be done authentically and transparently. It requires emotional intelligence and trust-building.

 

8. Empathy

Empathy is correlated with job performance. If you show more empathy towards your direct reports, our research shows you’re more likely to be viewed as a better performer by your boss. Empathy can be learned, and in addition to making you more effective, it will also improve work for you and those around you.

 

9. Courage

It can be hard to speak up at work, whether you want to voice a new idea, provide feedback to a direct report, or flag a concern for someone above you. That’s part of the reason courage is a key skill for good leaders. Rather than avoiding problems or allowing conflicts to fester, courage enables leaders to step up and move things in the right direction. Learn more about why a positive workplace environment and culture requires courage and truth.

 

10. Respect

Treating people with respect on a daily basis is one of the most important things a leader can do. It will ease tensions and conflict, create trust, and improve effectiveness. Respect is more than the absence of disrespect, and it can be shown in many ways.

 

Importance of Leadership

·         Initiating Action: Leadership starts from the very beginning, even before the work starts. A leader is a person who communicates the policies and plans to the subordinates to start the work.

·         Providing Motivation: A leader motivates the employees by giving them financial and non-financial incentives and gets the work done efficiently. Motivation is the driving force in an individual’s life.

·         Providing guidance: A leader not only supervises the employees but also guides them in their work. He instructs the subordinates on how to perform their work effectively so that their efforts do not get wasted.

·         Creating confidence: A leader acknowledges the efforts of the employees, explains to them their role clearly and guides them to achieve their goals. He also resolves the complaints and problems of the employees, thereby building confidence in them regarding the organization.

·         Building work environment: A good leader should maintain personal contacts with the employees and should hear their problems and solve them. He always listens to the point of view of the employees and in case of disagreement persuades them to agree with him by giving suitable clarifications. In case of conflicts, he handles them carefully and does not allow it to adversely affect the entity. A positive and efficient work environment helps in stable growth of the organization.

·         Co-ordination: A leader reconciles the personal interests of the employees with the organizational goals and achieves co-ordination in the entity.

·         Creating Successors: A leader trains his subordinates in such a manner that they can succeed him in future easily in his absence. He creates more leaders

Induces change: A leader persuades, clarifies, and inspires employees to accept any change in the organization without much resistance and discontentment. He makes sure that employees do not feel insecure about the changes. https://www.toppr.com/guides/business-studies/directing/leadership/

 

Role of a Leader

Following are the main roles of a leader in an organization (https://www.managementstudyguide.com/role_of_a_leader.htm)

  1. Required at all levels- Leadership is a function which is important at all levels of management. In the top level, it is important for getting cooperation in formulation of plans and policies. In the middle and lower level, it is required for interpretation and execution of plans and programs framed by the top management. Leadership can be exercised through guidance and counseling of the subordinates at the time of execution of plans.
  2. Representative of the organization- A leader, i.e., a manager is said to be the representative of the enterprise. He has to represent the concern at seminars, conferences, general meetings, etc. His role is to communicate the rationale of the enterprise to outside public. He is also representative of the own department which he leads.
  3. Integrates and reconciles the personal goals with organizational goals- A leader through leadership traits helps in reconciling/ integrating the personal goals of the employees with the organizational goals. He is trying to co-ordinate the efforts of people towards a common purpose and thereby achieves objectives. This can be done only if he can influence and get willing co-operation and urge to accomplish the objectives.
  4. He solicits support- A leader is a manager and besides that he is a person who entertains and invites support and co-operation of subordinates. This he can do by his personality, intelligence, maturity and experience which can provide him positive result. In this regard, a leader has to invite suggestions and if possible implement them into plans and programs of enterprise. This way, he can solicit full support of employees which results in willingness to work and thereby effectiveness in running of a concern.
  5. As a friend, philosopher and guide- A leader must possess the three dimensional traits in him. He can be a friend by sharing the feelings, opinions and desires with the employees. He can be a philosopher by utilizing his intelligence and experience and thereby guiding the employees as and when time requires. He can be a guide by supervising and communicating the employees the plans and policies of top management and secure their co-operation to achieve the goals of a concern. At times he can also play the role of a counselor by counseling and a problem-solving approach. He can listen to the problems of the employees and try to solve them.

Emotional Intelligence for Leaders

Emotional intelligence is widely known to be a key component of effective leadership. The ability to be perceptively in tune with yourself and your emotions, as well as having sound situational awareness can be a powerful tool for leading a team. The act of knowing, understanding, and responding to emotions, overcoming stress in the moment, and being aware of how your words and actions affect others, is described as emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence for leadership can consist of these five attributes: self-awareness, self-management, empathy, relationship management, and effective communication. (Gleeson, 2015)

Leaders are closely observed in terms of their body language, facial expressions etc. So, it is important for a leader to consider the non-verbal form of expressions as well, which may positively or negatively influence followers. Therefore, if a leader is talking about ethics in business with a slightly unconvinced and bemused look on his face, the followers make a note of it and the message is not received by them. A leader has to act as a role model too, supporting his statements, ideologies and values with appropriate actions.

As a leader one also has to be aware of one’s own capabilities and weaknesses, it is difficult to accept guidance from a leader who is not self-aware. As managers, leaders have to empathize as well with the situations, emotions, aspirations and motivations of the subordinates. A decreasing performance of a team member might be because of a number of reasons, a disruptive worker might be facing motivation issues and a subordinate who uses abusive language with others might be lacking confidence in his own abilities. A leader needs to discern facts and try and reach to deeper levels and understand things beyond obvious.

Emotional Intelligence is also important because the followers or subordinate expect it from their leaders. A subordinate working closely with the manager would expect the manager to understand his situation and priorities. And not surprisingly, whether manager does so or not, affects his level of commitment and performance at work. A leader has to suitably know and understand when he/she needs to be directive and when he needs to delegate. He/she needs to be aware, when the team members are acting as one unit and when there are differences. (https://www.managementstudyguide.com/emotional-intelligence-for-leaders.htm)

 

Conclusion

Many of us in leadership or management positions know what we need to do to be better leaders, we just sometimes fail to act. Being a great leader requires constant personal and professional development, regular transparent feedback from the team, self-reflection and taking action on feedback received. Great leaders are rarely satisfied with their performance. Without the team there can be no real leadership.  Effective leaders have specific attributes it shows specific behavior of styles of leadership. The effective leader creates the situation that is best for the organization through the use of skills and processes. The significance of business leadership is well expressed by this organization: A good leader can make a success of a weak business, but a poor leader can destroy even the best plan. ( Madanchian, et.al, 2017)

Leaders and their leadership skills play an important role in the growth of any organization. Leadership refers to the process of influencing the behavior of people in a manner that they strive willingly and enthusiastically towards the achievement of group objectives. A leader should have the ability to maintain good interpersonal relations with the followers or subordinates and motivate them to help in achieving the organizational objectives.

Leaders will be successful as they become skilled, sometimes forceful, in practicing these core elements of vision, strategy, operations, and tactics. But the most successful leaders also blend these with other core leadership attributes of gratitude, humility, and caring. The opportunity to provide leadership should be seen as a gift, not an entitlement. All too often the leader may feel that he or she should have all the answers. As noted earlier, leaders should be skilled at asking the right questions, rather than holding themselves to the impossible task of being all knowing. Finally, inspirational leaders demonstrate that they care about others, first, for who they are and, second, for what they can do. In other works, exemplary leaders regard others first as “human beings,” rather than as “human doings.” (Baker, 2014)

References

 

Baker, Edward L. MD, MPH Leadership and Management—Guiding Principles, Best Practices, and Core Attributes, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice: May/June 2014 - Volume 20 - Issue 3 - p 356-357. Retrieved from doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000063, July 11, 2020

Clarke L. Qualities That Define a Good Leader (13 Personal Traits), Retrieved from https://inside.6q.io/qualities-that-define-a-good-leader/, July 11, 2020

Goleman D. (1999), What makes a leader? Clinical Laboratory Management Review : Official Publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association. 1999 May-Jun;13(3):123-131. Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/article/med/10557873, July 11, 2020

Gleeson B. (2016), Leadership Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brentgleeson/2016/11/09/10-unique-perspectives-on-what-makes-a-great-leader/#53e2838d5dd1, July 11, 2020

Gleeson B. (2015), 5 Aspects of Emotional Intelligence Required for Effective Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.inc.com/brent-gleeson/5-aspects-of-emotional-intelligence-required-for-effective-leadership.html#:~:text=Emotional%20intelligence%20for%20leadership%20can,relationship%20management%2C%20and%20effective%20communication.&text=A%20leader%20lacking%20in%20emotional,expectations%20of%20those%20they%20lead. July 11, 2020

Hughes, Richard, Ginnett, C. Robert, Curphy, J. Gordon. 1999. Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. New York: McGraw Hill

Juneja P. (2020) Role of a Leader. Retrieved from https://www.managementstudyguide.com/role_of_a_leader.htm, July 11, 2020

Juneja P. (2020) Emotional Intelligence for Leaders. Retrieved from https://www.managementstudyguide.com/emotional-intelligence-for-leaders.htm, July 11, 2020

Meraku A. (2017), Role of Leadership in Organizational Effectiveness, Journal of Economics, Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 11, November 2017. Retrieved from http://www.joebm.com/vol5/535-ES0060.pdf, July 11, 2020

Madanchian, M., Hussein, N., Noordin, F., & Taherdoost, H. (2017). Leadership Effectiveness Measurement and Its Effect on Organization Outcomes. In Procedia Engineering (Vol. 181, pp. 1043–1048). Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.505, July 11, 2020

Rush G. (2012) Why We Need Leaders . Realizing Leadership, Issue 1 November 2012., Retrieved https://www.mgrconsulting.com/index.php/44-focused-enewsletters-gary-rush-facilitation/leadership-concepts-by-gary-rush-facilitation/226-why-we-need-leaders, July 11, 2020

Sarna S.K. (2015), Importance of leadership for Organizational Excellence. Retrieved from https://www.ispatguru.com/importance-of-leadership-for-organizational-excellence/, July 11, 2020

What Are the Characteristics of a Good Leader?, Retrieved from https://www.ccl.org/blog/characteristics-good-leader/, July 11, 2020

 


Friday, May 15, 2020

Save Ourselves and Not the Environment: A Secondary Reflection on the COVID-19


Damianus Abun
Several times I have published my research papers in the peer-reviewed international journal related to the environment. The first paper was about the environmental attitude and environmental behavior of Catholic colleges in Region I, Philippines. This paper was published in the Texila International Journal of Academic Research, Vol. 4, issue 1, 2017. The second research paper was related to the same topic. It was about the environmental attitude and environmental behavior of Senior High School Students of Divine Word Colleges in Region I, Philippines. It was published by the EPH-International Journal of education research, Vol. 1, Issue, 2, 2017. The two studies have found that most employees and students are influenced by the anthropocentric attitude in which human beings view the environment as the instrument of human pleasure or welfare. The environment is treated as an object to be used by humans. This attitude has affected their behavior toward the environment. They do not respect the natural environment and they throw garbage everywhere. They do not save energy, etc. Such an attitude affects the natural environment. The third paper that I published was about solving environmental problems is changing cultural perception toward the environment, published in the International Journal of Current Research, Vol. 10, Issue, 8, 2018. This paper is a kind of summary of the two previous papers. The paper saw the root cause of the environmental problem in the human attitude or cultural perception toward the environment. There is a need to change our attitude and cultural perception of the environment. 

I wrote these papers and published them with the hope that I can contribute ideas on how to save the environment. I believe too that many researchers out there have conducted researches in line with the natural environmental issues because of the same concern to save the environment. Readers have sent feedbacks to me that through my research, they have opened their minds to see that solving the environmental problem is a holistic approach. The positive feedback that I got emboldens me to believe that I have contributed ideas in saving the natural environment. Governments everywhere have discussed issues on natural environmental problems and have instituted legislation to protect the environment. The latest was the Paris Climate Change Agreement to convince all countries to put in place policies to protect the environment. Individual persons, NGOs, and the government are worried about how to save the environment. The ecosystem has been damaged, the climate has changed and naturally, human life continuity is in danger. This is the main concern of why people are calling for the government to curb the use of fossil fuel and go for green energy because of its negative effect on the natural environment as a whole which affects the ecosystem. People have been calling to save the future generation. Again all these efforts to protect the natural environment are motivated by the concern of human survival. If human life is not affected, probably people will not be bothered and call for the protection of the natural environment. Again human is the center of the concern. People have not learned and have not seen themselves and the natural environment as one ecosystem that is interconnected and affected one another.  

The question is: are we saving the natural environment or are we saving ourselves? Gary Pekas (2011) in his reflection contended that we are not saving the environment because the environment will take care of itself but actually what we are doing is to save ourselves. Jeffrey Shaw (2016) also had the same kind of reflection that nature will take care of itself. Before human beings occupy the planet, nature or the natural environment has been there. Animals and human beings may disappear or maybe evolved into a different form of human beings to adapt to nature but nature will be still there. No matter what humans will do to nature, nature will heal itself (Reynolds, 2010).  Reynolds contended that the earth has been going through many cases of abuse but the earth is still here. Reynolds quoted the idea of professor Laughlin, Stanford University physicist, said, “ "The geologic record suggests that climate ought not to concern us too much when we gaze into the future," he says, "not because it's unimportant but because it's beyond our power to control." “Whatever humans throw at it, in other words, Earth will fix things in its own time and way”. Taking from the ideas of Laughlin, Reynolds advises us to remain calm because nature will take care of itself. He took an example of rain. The rain has been falling since the beginning of time and yet the amount of water in the earth’s ocean has not changed significantly. Ice melting happened 15,000 years ago but the sea level rose by one centimetre a year for 10,000 years. The earth does not care what we are doing, what the government is doing, it will take care of itself.  

Based on geologic time, we would argue that climate change is not only happening in our time, it has been happening ever since. The earth has gone through dramatic changes in its history throughout its 4.5 billion histories. It has gone through climatic changes and the history of life has been influenced by these climatic changes which may alter the course of evolution. Life is a causative effect of these changes (Encyclopaedia Britannica).

Recently there is good news that the ozone layer is healing. National Geographic (n.d) defines the ozone layer as “one layer of the stratosphere, the second layer of the Earth’s atmosphere. The stratosphere is the mass of protective gases clinging to our planet”. When the ozone layer is damaged, there is no protection over the earth and nothing can survive on the planet. According to the study posted in Science Alert (2019), the ozone layer above Antarctica has recovered much, and scientists have acknowledged that this recovery is probably caused by the Montreal Protocol (1987). According to them, this could reverse some troubling changes in air currents around the Southern Hemisphere. However, many have also doubted that the healing of the ozone layer is due to the Montreal Protocol. And so Kundhu (2020) wrote in India Today that this change has nothing to do with the lock down. Despite these denials, one cannot deny that one of the biggest contributors to the ozone layer depletion is China. Because of Covid-19 and lock down, China had stopped everything, all industries are shutting down, all cars and airplanes are not moving and flying. As a result of these changes, the air above China becomes cleaner and less polluted. The water becomes clear and animals can go back to its habitat. It is not only true in China but throughout the whole world. All kinds of industries have been shutting down. It brings great impact on the healing of the ozone layer. Can we still deny that lock down had brought healing to the ozone layer? The nature through COVID-19 has healed the ozone layer. Though human denies that nature can defend and heal itself from human encroachment but the fact is that COVID-19 has shut down all human activities and because of that the environment  is getting healthier.  

Covid-19 is a zoonotic disease and therefore it comes from nature which passes from animals to humans. It is believed to be originated in bats before passing to humans. Covid-19 could be nature’s way to defend itself from damaging. Last May 14, 2020, Paula Ramon posted an article on yahoo news about Amazon that could be the next virus hot zone. She quoted David Lapola, a Brazilian ecologist, “human encroachment on animals’ habitats- a likely main culprit in coronavirus outbreak. Amazon forest is a huge reservoir of viruses”. Human encroachment toward nature has been too much and nature could not stomach it any longer. Nature has its army in the forms of viruses to protect itself and this is also true to human life. There is a natural system in our body to protect itself from anything that threatens its existence but humans have not discovered its natural system to cure itself.  

Finally, the war is ongoing between human beings and nature through COVID-19 and the losers are definitely human beings. The streets are empty, manufacturing companies are empty and all kinds of industries  are shut down and human beings are hiding inside their home. the nature slowly is healing itself, the ozone layer is healing, the air becomes clean, and the animals come back to their habitats. Nature has won the battle. Now, how do we protect ourselves to survive? Life should change and align it with nature and nature will become our friend. COVID – 19 will change our lives and the way we live. We need to live in harmony with the environment.       

Saturday, January 11, 2020

Utility : The measure of virtue



By Ronalyn R. Tagudin

Doctor of Philosophy Major in Development Management Student


ABSTRACT
            The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or, the one. Act always so as to promote the greatest good for the greatest number of persons - utilitarianism.
            The moral rightness or wrongness of an action is to be judged by its results or consequences. Consequences of an act determine its value. If an act produces happiness of the people on a large scale, it is morally right; if it produces unhappiness on a large scale, it is said to be morally wrong. However, the result of an act may be actual or probable. An act may produce immediate pleasure or happiness or it may produce happiness in remote future. So the act that produces happiness in general is considered as morally right.
            If the principle of utility be a right principle to be governed by, and that in all cases, it follows from what has been just observed, that whatever principle differs from it in any case must necessarily be a wrong one. To prove any other principle, therefore, to be a wrong one, there needs no more than just to show it to be what it is, a principle of which the dictates are in some point or other different from those of the principle of utility: to state it is to confute it (Wiley, 2008).

Keywords: greatest good, utility, happiness, greatest number of persons, moral

INTRODUCTION
            According to Jeremy Bentham, utilitarianism is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to produce the reverse of the happiness – not just the happiness of the performer of the action but also that of everyone affected by it (Duignan, 2019).
            Utilitarianism is an effort to provide an answer to the practical question “What ought a person to do?” The answer is that a person ought to act so as to produce the best consequences possible. So, given that thought, are we obligated to act to promote overall wellbeing when that is incompatible with our own? Admitting that people do sometimes act benevolently – with the overall good of humanity in mind. The view that utility is the measure of virtue.

The Classical Approach
            If anything could be identified as the fundamental motivation behind the development of Classical Utilitarianism it would be the desire to see useless, corrupt laws and social practices changed. Accomplishing this goal required a normative ethical theory employed as a critical tool. What is the truth about what makes an action or a policy a morally good one, or morally right? But developing the theory itself was also influenced by strong views about what was wrong in their society. The conviction that, for example, some laws are bad resulted in analysis of why they were bad. And, for Jeremy Bentham, what made them bad was their lack of utility, their tendency to lead to unhappiness and misery without any compensating happiness. If a law or an action doesn’t do any good, then it is isn’t any good (Driver, 2014).
            In this view, actions are approved when they are such as to promote happiness, or pleasure, and disapproved of when they have a tendency to cause unhappiness, or pain. We should be actively trying to promote overall happiness thus, promote the overall well-being when that it is incompatible with one’s own.

The Principle of Utility
            According to Wiley (2008), there are principles of utility that should be considered as follows: (a) The principle of utility is the foundation of the present work: it will be proper therefore at the outset to give an explicit and determinate account of what is meant by it. By the principle of utility is meant that principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question: or, what is the same thing in other words, to promote or to oppose that happiness; (b) By utility is meant that property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness, or to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness to the party whose interest is considered: if that party be the community in general, then the happiness of the community: if a particular individual, then the happiness of that individual; (c) The interest of the community is one of the most general expressions that can occur; (d) It is in vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual and; (e) An action then may be said to be comfortable to the principle of utility, or, for shortness sake, to utility, when the tendency it has to augment the happiness of the community is greater than any it has to diminish it.
            Further, Jeremy Bentham (1843) formulated a theory of ethics and jurisprudence which is remarkable for its clarity and consistency. He began with the psychological generalization that all actions are motivated by the desire for pleasure and the fear of pain. Hence he claimed,

“Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of right and wrong, on the other hand the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne. They govern us in all we do, in all we say, in all we think...”

            Therefore, by the principle of utility, Bentham maintains that the ideal method for determining whether an individual’s action or a legal act is right or wrong would be through evaluation of its total tendency to promote happiness or to promote unhappiness to the other. In such a situation if the former predominates then the action is right, if the latter then it is wrong.

            However, Rasdall (1907) said that “…again one’s own interest is taken into account in doing good to others. For it is hoped that the others also will do good to one in return. An individual lives in a society. As he is not self-sufficient, needs the assistance of others. An enlightened self-interest is manifested in the cooperative spirit among the individuals which is in order to secure their own interest.” In this regards, Bentham claimed that benevolent actions are rewarded with pleasure as:
The pleasures of benevolence are the pleasures resulting from the view of any pleasures supposed to be possessed by the beings that may be the objects of benevolence…there may also be called the pleasures of good will, the pleasures of sympathy, or the pleasures of the benevolent or social affections.

            Bentham thought that if doing well to others makes the agent happy, then there can be no real opposition between self-interest and the principle of utility; to promote the public happiness is the way to make happy oneself.

Self-Sacrifice
            Only while the world is in a very imperfect state can it happen that anyone’s best chance of serving the happiness of others is through the absolute sacrifice of his own happiness; but while the world is in that imperfect state, I fully admit that the readiness to make such a sacrifice is the highest virtue that can be found in man.
            The utilitarian morality does recognize that human beings can sacrifice their own greatest good for the good of others; it merely refuses to admit that the sacrifice is itself a good. It regards as wasted any sacrifice that doesn’t increase, or tend to increase, the sum total of happiness. The only self-renunciation that it applauds is devotion to the happiness, or to some of the means to happiness, of others. . . . (Bennett, 2017).
            Moreover, Bennett (2017) states that as the practical way to get as close as possible to this ideal, the ethics of utility would command two things. (1) First, laws and social arrangements should place the happiness (or what for practical purposes we may call the interest) of every individual as much as possible in harmony with the interest of the whole. (2) Second, education and opinion, which have such a vast power over human character, should use that power to establish in the mind of every individual an unbreakable link between his own happiness and the good of the whole; especially between his own happiness and the kinds of conduct (whether doing or allowing) that are conducive to universal happiness.
            If it is done properly, it will tend to have two results: (a) The individual won’t be able to conceive the possibility of being personally happy while acting in ways opposed to the general good and; (b) In each individual a direct impulse to promote the general good will be one of the habitual motives of action, and the feelings connected with it will fill a large and prominent place in his sentient existence. This is the true character of the utilitarian morality.

Common Criticisms of Utilitarianism
            Again, to repeat something that the opponents of utilitarianism are seldom fair enough to admit, namely that the happiness that forms the utilitarian standard of what is right in conduct is not the agent’s own happiness but that of all concerned. As between his own happiness and that of others, utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a disinterested and benevolent spectator.
            By far and away the most common criticism of utilitarianism can be reduced simply to: "I don't like it" or "It doesn't suit my way of thinking". Producing the greatest good for the greatest number is fine as long as you are not hurting someone you really love in the process. This is the case when utilitarianism runs into problems when sentiment is involved.
            In addition, it is impossible and too difficult to apply. The happiness cannot be quantified or measured, that there is no way of calculating a trade-off between intensity and extent, or intensity and probability, or comparing happiness to suffering. We cannot calculate all the effects for all the individuals (either because of the large number of individuals involved, and/or because of the uncertainty). The principle of utility is, essentially, a description of what makes something right or wrong - so in order for it to fail, someone must give an example of something which is useful but obviously wrong. The principle does not imply that we can calculate what is right or wrong - completely accurately, in advance, or at all! It does not harm the principle of utility at all merely to comment that it is difficult for us to work out what is right - it is merely a lament against the human condition (https://www.utilitarian.org/criticisms.html).

CONCLUSION
            The doctrine that the basis of morals is utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong in proportion as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.
            The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible is that people hear it; and similarly with the other sources of our experience. If happiness, the end that the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself, were not acknowledged in theory and in practice to be an end, nothing could ever convince any person that it was an end.
            No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except the fact that each person desires his own happiness, so far as he thinks it is attainable. But this is a fact; so we have not only all the proof there could be for such a proposition, and all the proof that could possibly be demanded, that happiness is a good, that each person’s happiness is a good to that person, and therefore that general happiness is a good to the aggregate of all persons. Happiness has made good its claim to be one of the ends of conduct, and consequently one of the criteria of morality (Bennett, 2017).


REFERENCES
Bentham, J. (1843). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.
Bennett, J. (2017). Utilitarianism.
Driver, J. (2014). The History of Utilitarianism.
Duignan, B. & West, H. (2019). Utilitarianism Philosophy. http://www.britannica.com/topic/utilitarianism-philosophy/Historical-survey. Retrieved, January 11, 2020.

Most Common Criticisms of Utilitarianism. Retrieved, from https://www.utilitarian.org/criticisms.html January 11, 2020.

Rasdall, H. (1907). the Theory of Good and Evil, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wiley, J & Sons. (2008). Utilitarianism and on liberty: Including Mill’s’ Essay on Bentham and selections from the writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin.




cdn.viglink.com/api/vglnk.js

Saturday, October 12, 2019

Management discretion : Weighing the positive and negative ethical implications


ORLAINE APRIL T. TOLENTINO, MBA



ABSTRACT

This article aims to assess the positive and negative effects of management discretion and how it becomes an issue of morality in the organization. It identifies the moral arguments and limitations on the exercise of management discretion, how it becomes unfavorable and detrimental to an organization, and how it is perceived on a positive light which promotes common good. The author concludes that although the exercise of management discretion has been negatively perceived, there is a strong conviction that man is has an innate ability to make moral judgments.

Keywords: Management directions, ethical implications, positive use, abuse of discretion

INTRODUCTION

Discretion is plainly defined as an exercise of one’s own authority and judgment (Webster’s Third International Unabridged Dictionary). Sandilands (n.d.) provides a deeper sense to the definition and says that discretion it is “the ability to make a judgment, a choice or a responsible decision.” The etymology of the word date back to the 13th century where the word dyscrecyounne was first introduced and understood as the "ability to perceive and understand," and later on was given meaning in the mid-14th century as a "moral discernment, ability to distinguish right from wrong" (Online Etymology Dictionary, n.d.). The understanding of discretion as a moral discernment is supported and explained further through the theory that “man is a thinking being who acts with purpose and reason… and knows whether his actions are right or wrong/good or bad… and that man is a free being who acts according to his will and volitions and he has the capacity to exercise his choices and to choose and do what is good” (Abun, D. 2013). Discretion therefore, can be understood as moral judgment.

The terms Management Discretion, Management Prerogative, or Employer Discretion are commonly used interchangeably in the business world. These terms imply the right of an employer to make decisions that are deemed beneficial to the operation of the business. Discretionary powers are most often vested to high-ranking officers in a company who include department heads, managers, and directors who have a direct hand in the management of the company’s business operations. They may have the discretion on the company’s finances, discretion to hire or fire employees or discretion on the disclosure of company information.

Limitations to the exercise of discretion

The right to exercise discretion in making business decisions, however, is substantially bounded by the policies of each organization and by enacted laws. Every company has its written or unwritten rules stating the limits or each manager’s authority – often in the form of a job description or appointment letter. These limitations serve as the control measure in the exercise of discretion in decision-making. Issues related to abuse of discretion most frequently arise when managers over-step these limitations. In order to avoid this, the company’s top management must spell out clearly its rules and define the manager’s decision-making limits. In such cases that the manager makes decisions out of his capacity, top management must stand firm to impose the corresponding disciplinary measure to the erring manager.

Positive Use

Although the view on discretion varies from person to person, the exercise of discretion is pre-supposed to benefit the interest of the organization. Lord Scarman (n.d.), an English judge and barrister, who served as a Law Lord of England called discretion as “the Art of suiting action to particular circumstances.” Further, the idiom “Discretion is the better part of valor” is generally understood to mean the avoidance of problems or unnecessary risks by thinking carefully and exercising caution before taking action.

According to Espedal, B. (2013), “Managerial discretion is generally seen as a leadership capacity that affects organizations’ ability to adapt to new and changing demands and circumstances.” When exercised correctly, discretion becomes both an advantage and leverage for an organization to adapt to the consistent developments in the business world.

In addition, a study entitled “In Search of Informed Discretion: An Experimental Investigation of Fairness and Trust Reciprocity”, which was written by Victor S.Maas, Marcel van Rinsum and Kristy L.Towry and published in The Accounting Review revealed that that most managers are driven by powerful, non-selfish motives that include a strong preference for fairness. Although the use of managerial discretion is often associated with favoritism, the study revealed that managers have an inherent interest in fairness and trust reciprocity.

Above all, ethical consideration must be taken into account in order to maximize the benefit of management discretion, citing the statement of Acosta, P. (2015) to wit:
For one, as in all cases involving the use of management prerogative, it must be exercised in good faith for the advancement of the employer’s interest, not for the purpose of defeating or circumventing the rights of the employees under special laws or under valid agreements”

Abuse of Discretion

Discretion when exercised without careful consideration of facts and law constitute an abuse and raises the issue morality. One of the areas in an organization which is most concerned with regards to the use of discretion is human resources. The use of discretionary measures in the selection and appointment, performance appraisal, promotion, and employee discipline and termination, are often regarded with issues of morality.

The case of Dumisa vs The University of Durban Westville (2001, 7 BALR 753) tackles an issue on promotion where the employer decided not to promote the employee, Dumisa, citing the latter’s failure to meet the promotional policy criteria. And while there was no issue on the promotional policy criteria, it was found that the employer made a previous promise to consider the employee for promotion creating an expectation on the part of the employee. There is a question therefore as to what grounds does a manger have the discretion to decide that whether an employee is not suitable for promotion?
The “Endo” (coined term for End-of-Contract) is one of the recent issues of unfair labor practice in the Philippines, to which President Rodrigo R. Duterte has vetoed the bill that seeks to prohibit the practice of labor-only contracting method. A majority of companies in the Philippines who employ a large number of workers practice labor-only contracting, wherein the tenure of the said workers is up to six (6) months. However, to avoid a labor law granting permanent tenure on the sixth month of service of the employee, these companies hire their workers up to five (5) months only. The bill has been snubbed by many business groups and they argued that “Job contracting as an exercise of management prerogative and business judgment is anchored on two constitutional rights: right and freedom to contract and right to property.”

CONCLUSION

The question whether management discretion is beneficial or detrimental to a business is debatable.  On the point of view of the business owner, they may rightfully look at discretion more positively. After all, no business owner would execute a decision or an action that may be detrimental to his business. However, there is an underlying issue whether the person who posess such discretionary power has the adequate knowledge and experience, and the morality to make responsible and sound and responsible decisions. According to the great Greek philosopher, Socrates, knowledge of good and evil and its criteria are imbued in man and he can differentiate between the two if he desires so. Considering this innate ability to determine good and bad, and if a person possesses the qualities of a strong moral leader, he is likely to make moral judgments that is aimed towards common good.


REFERENCES

1.Sandilands, Tracey. (n.d.). What Does Discretion Mean in the Business World? Small Business - Chron.com. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/discretion-mean-business-world-50093.html
2.   
   Israelstam, Ivan. (2014) Management Discretion: How far does it stretch?
3. Karlsson, T. S. (2018) Searching for managerial discretion: how public managers engage managerialism as a rationalization for increased latitude of action.

4.      Acosta, P. (2015), Management prerogative must be exercised in good faith, The Manila Times.

5.      Cigaral, I. N. (2019) Why Duterte vetoed the anti-endo bill, Philstar.

6.      Cigaral, I. N. (2019) Upsetting key campaign promise, Duterte officially vetoes anti-endo bill, Philstar.

7.      Abun, D. (2013) Be A Moral Judge Of Your Action.

8.      Espedal, B. (2013) Is managerial discretion good or bad for organizational adaptiveness? Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1742715013514879?journalCode=leaa#

9. Rinsum, M. v. (2013) Informed Discretion in Performance Evaluations, Rotterdam School Of Management, Erasmus University.

10.  The Labor Code of The Philippines http://www.chanrobles.com/legal4labor.htm
11.  Leslie Scarman, Baron Scarman (b.1911-d.2004) on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Scarman,_Baron_Scarman


13.  Online Etymology Dictionary https://www.etymonline.com/word/discretion


Building a fair Hiring process: Overcoming political challenges

  BLESSIE JANE PAZ B. ANTONIO JANICE D. RASAY Divine Word College of Laoag, Ilocos Norte, Philippines Abstract The hiring process and pr...